Disentangling acoustic and social biases in creaky voice perception: The effects of f0 and face gender on creakiness ratings

Creaky voice has historically been associated with men’s speech, supported by acoustic studies. Since around 2010, however, sociolinguistic work alongside public discourse has perpetuated greater creaky voice use by women, typically implementing impressionistic coding. This study investigates whether this recent shift can be attributed to perceptual social and acoustic biases related to (perceived) speaker gender and pitch (f0), respectively. Using a matched-guise paradigm, 40 Canadian English listeners rated the perceived creakiness of the same modal and creaky voices—altered to have ambiguously gendered formants and median f0s (115, 135, 155 Hz)—paired with female and male faces. Bayesian regression analyses revealed strong effects of voice quality and moderate effects of f0: Creaky and lower-f0 stimuli were rated as creakier. No overall effect of face gender was found. However, a weak interaction between face gender and f0 suggests a possible gender prototypicality bias: At lower f0s, female faces were rated as slightly creakier than male faces and at higher f0s, male faces were rated creakier than female faces. These findings show that neither acoustic nor gender-based biases alone can account for widespread reports of women-led creaky voice use. Several possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.24285
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling acoustic and social biases in creaky voice perception: The effects of f0 and face gender on creakiness ratings

Meghan Clayards, Jeanne Brown
Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Disentangling acoustic and social biases in creaky voice perception: The effects of f0 and face gender on creakiness ratings

Meghan Clayards, Jeanne Brown
article en

Abstract

Creaky voice has historically been associated with men’s speech, supported by acoustic studies. Since around 2010, however, sociolinguistic work alongside public discourse has perpetuated greater creaky voice use by women, typically implementing impressionistic coding. This study investigates whether this recent shift can be attributed to perceptual social and acoustic biases related to (perceived) speaker gender and pitch (f0), respectively. Using a matched-guise paradigm, 40 Canadian English listeners rated the perceived creakiness of the same modal and creaky voices—altered to have ambiguously gendered formants and median f0s (115, 135, 155 Hz)—paired with female and male faces. Bayesian regression analyses revealed strong effects of voice quality and moderate effects of f0: Creaky and lower-f0 stimuli were rated as creakier. No overall effect of face gender was found. However, a weak interaction between face gender and f0 suggests a possible gender prototypicality bias: At lower f0s, female faces were rated as slightly creakier than male faces and at higher f0s, male faces were rated creakier than female faces. These findings show that neither acoustic nor gender-based biases alone can account for widespread reports of women-led creaky voice use. Several possible explanations for this discrepancy are discussed.

Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory PhonologyVol. 17(1)
McGill University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.