Poster Session I - A119 ONE VERSUS TWO FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTS IN THE DETECTION OF ADVANCED COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA

Abstract Background FIT is widely used for CRC screenings. Most Canadian programs only use one FIT sample when determining the need for a colonoscopy. It is unclear if an analysis of both samples in a standard two-sample kit improves detection of CRC and advanced adenomas. Aims To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of one versus two abnormal FIT in the detection of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. Methods Over a five year period from 2020 to 2025, 84,489 completed FIT kits were received by the Newfoundland and Labrador colon cancer screening program. A participant completed two FIT samples and if one FIT was positive ( > =100ng/ml) a colonoscopy was arranged. Data collected included demographics, colonoscopy, pathology, and quantitative FIT results. PPV of one versus two abnormal FITs was calculated. Results 10,237 patients (12.1%) were positive when the FIT was analyzed. 9,203 colonoscopies were completed and 249 (2.7%) colorectal cancers were detected. The number of advanced adenomas was 26.2% and overall Adenoma Detection Rate was 61.1%. Of the 249 cancers detected, 183 patients had both FIT samples positive while 66 patients had one FIT sample positive and one negative, 33 of 249 (13.3%) of all cancers would have been missed if only one FIT was analyzed. For 2415 participants with advanced adenomas 1194 had one FIT positive and 1219 had both positive. If only one FIT test was analyzed 597 advanced adenomas would have been missed. The positive predictive value (PPV) of one vs. two positive FITs for cancer was 2.4% vs 2.7% (p value < 0.01) and the PPV for advanced adenoma was 19.8% vs. 26.2% (p value < 0.01). When the first FIT was negative, the second positive FIT detected 33 additional cancers and an extra 592 advanced adenomas. Absolute FIT values were also higher for patients with two FIT positive compared to one FIT positive for both cancer (6449 vs. 5337) and advanced adenomas (2243 vs. 878). Conclusions PPV of two positive FITs is superior to one positive FIT for both colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. There was an added value when participants completed a second FIT kit. Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.119
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session I - A119 ONE VERSUS TWO FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTS IN THE DETECTION OF ADVANCED COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA

Gina M. Doyle, Mark Borgaonkar, S Antle, J McGrath et al.
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Poster Session I - A119 ONE VERSUS TWO FECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TESTS IN THE DETECTION OF ADVANCED COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA

Gina M. Doyle, Mark Borgaonkar, S Antle, J McGrath, B McGrath
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background FIT is widely used for CRC screenings. Most Canadian programs only use one FIT sample when determining the need for a colonoscopy. It is unclear if an analysis of both samples in a standard two-sample kit improves detection of CRC and advanced adenomas. Aims To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of one versus two abnormal FIT in the detection of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. Methods Over a five year period from 2020 to 2025, 84,489 completed FIT kits were received by the Newfoundland and Labrador colon cancer screening program. A participant completed two FIT samples and if one FIT was positive ( > =100ng/ml) a colonoscopy was arranged. Data collected included demographics, colonoscopy, pathology, and quantitative FIT results. PPV of one versus two abnormal FITs was calculated. Results 10,237 patients (12.1%) were positive when the FIT was analyzed. 9,203 colonoscopies were completed and 249 (2.7%) colorectal cancers were detected. The number of advanced adenomas was 26.2% and overall Adenoma Detection Rate was 61.1%. Of the 249 cancers detected, 183 patients had both FIT samples positive while 66 patients had one FIT sample positive and one negative, 33 of 249 (13.3%) of all cancers would have been missed if only one FIT was analyzed. For 2415 participants with advanced adenomas 1194 had one FIT positive and 1219 had both positive. If only one FIT test was analyzed 597 advanced adenomas would have been missed. The positive predictive value (PPV) of one vs. two positive FITs for cancer was 2.4% vs 2.7% (p value < 0.01) and the PPV for advanced adenoma was 19.8% vs. 26.2% (p value < 0.01). When the first FIT was negative, the second positive FIT detected 33 additional cancers and an extra 592 advanced adenomas. Absolute FIT values were also higher for patients with two FIT positive compared to one FIT positive for both cancer (6449 vs. 5337) and advanced adenomas (2243 vs. 878). Conclusions PPV of two positive FITs is superior to one positive FIT for both colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. There was an added value when participants completed a second FIT kit. Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.