Poster Session II - A217 SECOND-LINE INFLIXIMAB THERAPY FOR CROHN’S DISEASE (SLIT-CD): A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background Current North American guidelines position infliximab alongside other first line agents for the management of moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD). However, data on its efficacy as a second-line agent after advanced therapy remain limited. Aims The purpose of this study is to evaluate infliximab’s efficacy as a second-line agent and compare outcomes to first line use. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with CD treated with infliximab between 2016-2025 at a Canadian tertiary care hospital. Patients were categorized by timing of infliximab use (bio-naïve/first-line vs experienced). Clinical and endoscopic outcomes were compared at one year. Results Among 160 included patients, 123 received infliximab as first line therapy and 37 as second-line or subsequent; of these, 10 received it as third-line or subsequent. The most common reason to change therapy was secondary loss of response. There was no significant difference in disease location between patients who received infliximab as first or second line therapy. Clinical response (70.3% vs 89.4%) and clinical remission (43.2% vs 62.6%) at 1 year were both significantly lower in second-line users (p = 0.036 and p = 0.004, respectively). Of patients with endoscopic data available, response rates were also significantly lower in second-line users (56.5% vs 89.1%, p = 0.001) Second-line users also had significantly higher rates of hospitalization (29.7% vs 6.8%, p = 0.001) and surgery (35.1 vs 12.7%, p = 0.02) compared to first line users. There was no significant difference in immunomodulator use or dose escalation between groups. Conclusions Infliximab is an effective treatment for bio-experienced patients with CD, but clinical and endoscopic response rates may be reduced compared to first line users. Further studies are required to determine the optimum positioning and patient selection for infliximab within paradigms of care for CD. Crohn’s disease one year outcomes comparing first and second-line use of infliximab Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.216
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session II - A217 SECOND-LINE INFLIXIMAB THERAPY FOR CROHN’S DISEASE (SLIT-CD): A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Ashwin Varghese, Dorota Borovsky, Aaron Wen, Smita Halder et al.
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Poster Session II - A217 SECOND-LINE INFLIXIMAB THERAPY FOR CROHN’S DISEASE (SLIT-CD): A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Ashwin Varghese, Dorota Borovsky, Aaron Wen, Smita Halder, Abdulrahman Albassam, Kevin Grossman, C Galts, N Habib, H R Tran, J Marshall, S Anvari, N Narula
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Current North American guidelines position infliximab alongside other first line agents for the management of moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD). However, data on its efficacy as a second-line agent after advanced therapy remain limited. Aims The purpose of this study is to evaluate infliximab’s efficacy as a second-line agent and compare outcomes to first line use. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with CD treated with infliximab between 2016-2025 at a Canadian tertiary care hospital. Patients were categorized by timing of infliximab use (bio-naïve/first-line vs experienced). Clinical and endoscopic outcomes were compared at one year. Results Among 160 included patients, 123 received infliximab as first line therapy and 37 as second-line or subsequent; of these, 10 received it as third-line or subsequent. The most common reason to change therapy was secondary loss of response. There was no significant difference in disease location between patients who received infliximab as first or second line therapy. Clinical response (70.3% vs 89.4%) and clinical remission (43.2% vs 62.6%) at 1 year were both significantly lower in second-line users (p = 0.036 and p = 0.004, respectively). Of patients with endoscopic data available, response rates were also significantly lower in second-line users (56.5% vs 89.1%, p = 0.001) Second-line users also had significantly higher rates of hospitalization (29.7% vs 6.8%, p = 0.001) and surgery (35.1 vs 12.7%, p = 0.02) compared to first line users. There was no significant difference in immunomodulator use or dose escalation between groups. Conclusions Infliximab is an effective treatment for bio-experienced patients with CD, but clinical and endoscopic response rates may be reduced compared to first line users. Further studies are required to determine the optimum positioning and patient selection for infliximab within paradigms of care for CD. Crohn’s disease one year outcomes comparing first and second-line use of infliximab Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
Massachusetts General Hospital (US), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.