Round robin on structure analysis from 3D electron diffraction data

3D electron diffraction (3D ED) has undergone impressive development in the last decade. However, its accuracy and reproducibility have never been tested, up to now, in different laboratories on the same batch of samples. This paper reports a round robin on three test structures, two inorganic and one organic, solved and refined with 3D ED in seven different laboratories employing different transmission electron microscopes, with different acceleration voltages, different methodologies and different detectors. The results of the round robin show a remarkable accuracy of the technique that, in the case of kinematical refinement, is around 0.05 Å error on atomic positions for the inorganic samples and 0.15 Å for the beam-sensitive organic crystal. Dynamical refinement further improves the accuracy. The analysis of diverse samples and numerous data sets again confirms that dynamical refinement is a well established procedure, significantly reducing the refinement R factors, improving the accuracy of the structure models in most cases, and providing fine structural details, such as hydrogen-atom positions and the absolute structure, for both inorganic and organic samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IUCrJ
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1107/s205225252600045x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
38.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Round robin on structure analysis from 3D electron diffraction data

Eric van Genderen, Cheuk-Wai Tai, H. Chintakindi, Philippe Boullay et al.
1 citations
IUCrJ
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
38.53
article

Round robin on structure analysis from 3D electron diffraction data

Eric van Genderen, Cheuk-Wai Tai, H. Chintakindi, Philippe Boullay, J. Hadermann, Pavel Filipčík, Amirhossein Hajizadeh, A. Suresh, Erica Cordero-Oyonarte, L. Palatinus, Senik Matinyan, Branislav Jeriga, Moussa D. Faye Diouf, Laura Gemmrich Hernandéz, Vincentia Emerson AGBEMEH, Amatassalam Ben Meriem, A. Vypritskaia, Sara Passuti, Xiaodong Zou, Lei Wang, Marco Santucci, Jan Pieter Abrahams, Hongyi Xu, Mauro Gemmi, Olivier Pérez, Ute Kolb
article en
1 citations

Abstract

3D electron diffraction (3D ED) has undergone impressive development in the last decade. However, its accuracy and reproducibility have never been tested, up to now, in different laboratories on the same batch of samples. This paper reports a round robin on three test structures, two inorganic and one organic, solved and refined with 3D ED in seven different laboratories employing different transmission electron microscopes, with different acceleration voltages, different methodologies and different detectors. The results of the round robin show a remarkable accuracy of the technique that, in the case of kinematical refinement, is around 0.05 Å error on atomic positions for the inorganic samples and 0.15 Å for the beam-sensitive organic crystal. Dynamical refinement further improves the accuracy. The analysis of diverse samples and numerous data sets again confirms that dynamical refinement is a well established procedure, significantly reducing the refinement R factors, improving the accuracy of the structure models in most cases, and providing fine structural details, such as hydrogen-atom positions and the absolute structure, for both inorganic and organic samples.

IUCrJVol. 13(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Piaggio (Italy) (IT), University of Antwerp (BE), Stockholm University (SE), University of Basel (CH), École Nationale Supérieure d'Ingénieurs de Caen (FR), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Paul Scherrer Institute (CH), Normandie Université (FR), FZU ‒ Institute of Physics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (CZ), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
38.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.