A matter of principle or a matter of money? How fairness evaluations change with experimental currencies

We investigate how the information on monetary outcomes influences perceptions of fairness of income redistributions. In an economic experiment, participants initially rated the fairness of a redistribution scheme without knowing the exchange rate of experimental tokens to real money. After learning the monetary value of tokens, the participants adjusted their fairness ratings, generally perceiving redistributions that generate higher income for themselves as fairer. As the redistribution itself did not change, our findings suggest that awareness of monetary consequences affects perceptions of redistribution beyond mere self-interest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336459
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A matter of principle or a matter of money? How fairness evaluations change with experimental currencies

Wolfgang J. Luhan, Marina Chugunova
PLoS ONE
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

A matter of principle or a matter of money? How fairness evaluations change with experimental currencies

Wolfgang J. Luhan, Marina Chugunova
article en

Abstract

We investigate how the information on monetary outcomes influences perceptions of fairness of income redistributions. In an economic experiment, participants initially rated the fairness of a redistribution scheme without knowing the exchange rate of experimental tokens to real money. After learning the monetary value of tokens, the participants adjusted their fairness ratings, generally perceiving redistributions that generate higher income for themselves as fairer. As the redistribution itself did not change, our findings suggest that awareness of monetary consequences affects perceptions of redistribution beyond mere self-interest.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(2)
Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (DE), University of Portsmouth (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.