A clinical and nonclinical professionals assessment on the perceptions of ISO standards on healthcare practices and patient safety in Saudi Arabia

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards in healthcare aim to improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of medical devices, clinical processes, and health management systems of various countries across the world. This study reviews the perception of healthcare professionals about ISO standards at Saudi Arabia concerning patient safety, medical device management, and their overall influence on clinical and nonclinical practices. The previous study was based on the global healthcare systems of the US and Europe-like developed countries. The online cross-sectional survey of 300 respondents was selected from all regions and professions. Most of the respondents were from urban regions: Riyadh represented 30.4%, Jeddah 25.2%, and the Eastern Province represented 18.6%. The biomedical engineers constituted 43.3%, physicians comprised 29.2%, and most of the participants were males, 87%. Response to the question about ISO standards was that 79.8% agreed that ISO standards play a critical role in improving patient safety; biomedical engineers demonstrated 85.2%, while physicians were at 82.6%. Medical device calibration garnered 81.0% agree that ISO standards on calibration of medical devices are important. Differences across the 4 major regions demonstrated a strong level of agreement among respondents in Riyadh and Makkah but weaker levels among those in Asir and the Northern Borders, as follows: Riyadh 81.5%, Makkah 78.9%, Asir 58.9%, and Northern Borders 53.2%. ISO adoption barriers were reported for mostly nonclinical areas; training shortage, 56.8%, and resource unavailability were the main factors that acted as the main barriers. Besides, full agreement with relevance among ISO standards came to 85.9% among professionals with more than 15 years of experience. The inference to be drawn from such findings is that the same throw a critical light on the reception and application of ISO standards in Saudi healthcare and pinpoints those areas that require further amelioration and awareness across regions and professional groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000043392
Primary Topic
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A clinical and nonclinical professionals assessment on the perceptions of ISO standards on healthcare practices and patient safety in Saudi Arabia

Eyad Talal Attar
Medicine
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
article

A clinical and nonclinical professionals assessment on the perceptions of ISO standards on healthcare practices and patient safety in Saudi Arabia

Eyad Talal Attar
article en

Abstract

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards in healthcare aim to improve the quality, safety, and efficiency of medical devices, clinical processes, and health management systems of various countries across the world. This study reviews the perception of healthcare professionals about ISO standards at Saudi Arabia concerning patient safety, medical device management, and their overall influence on clinical and nonclinical practices. The previous study was based on the global healthcare systems of the US and Europe-like developed countries. The online cross-sectional survey of 300 respondents was selected from all regions and professions. Most of the respondents were from urban regions: Riyadh represented 30.4%, Jeddah 25.2%, and the Eastern Province represented 18.6%. The biomedical engineers constituted 43.3%, physicians comprised 29.2%, and most of the participants were males, 87%. Response to the question about ISO standards was that 79.8% agreed that ISO standards play a critical role in improving patient safety; biomedical engineers demonstrated 85.2%, while physicians were at 82.6%. Medical device calibration garnered 81.0% agree that ISO standards on calibration of medical devices are important. Differences across the 4 major regions demonstrated a strong level of agreement among respondents in Riyadh and Makkah but weaker levels among those in Asir and the Northern Borders, as follows: Riyadh 81.5%, Makkah 78.9%, Asir 58.9%, and Northern Borders 53.2%. ISO adoption barriers were reported for mostly nonclinical areas; training shortage, 56.8%, and resource unavailability were the main factors that acted as the main barriers. Besides, full agreement with relevance among ISO standards came to 85.9% among professionals with more than 15 years of experience. The inference to be drawn from such findings is that the same throw a critical light on the reception and application of ISO standards in Saudi healthcare and pinpoints those areas that require further amelioration and awareness across regions and professional groups.

MedicineVol. 105(7)
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Quality and Safety in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.