The more government subsidies, the lower the green innovation efficiency? Evidence from China's energy-intensive industries

Promoting green innovation in energy-intensive industries is of strategic significance for achieving sustainable economic and social development. However, the role of government subsidies in improving green innovation efficiency (GIE) remains unclear. This study employs a combined approach—network DEA, regression analysis, Bootstrap method, and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)—to examine the complex effects of government subsidies on GIE in energy-intensive sectors. Results show that, from a net effect perspective, high levels of government subsidies have a significant negative impact on GIE. This adverse effect is mitigated by market competition. In contrast, configurational analysis reveals that high government subsidies are not a necessary condition for achieving high GIE. One configuration leads to high efficiency under high-subsidy conditions, while two distinct pathways emerge under non-high subsidy regimes, indicating equifinality. These findings suggest that the relationship between government subsidies and GIE is not deterministic but depends on the interaction of multiple conditions—including market competition, and human resource. Rather than adopting uniform subsidy policies, policymakers should implement differentiated and context-sensitive strategies, strengthen market mechanisms, and optimize policy bundling. By combining net effect analysis and configurational effect analysis, this study provides a more comprehensive understanding of how government subsidies influence GIE. It advances analytical methods in green innovation research and offers empirical support for refining subsidy policies in energy-intensive sectors. • Regression analysis and QCA are utilized to explore the role of government subsidies. • Market competition mitigates the negative impact of government subsidies on GIE. • Government subsidies are not a necessary condition for achieving high GIE. • Achieving high GIE depends on the configuration of multiple influencing factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2026.102133
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
99.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The more government subsidies, the lower the green innovation efficiency? Evidence from China's energy-intensive industries

Shuzhen Zhou, Feng Peng, Cong Yu
1 citations
Energy Strategy Reviews
Innovation Policy and R&D
99.81
article

The more government subsidies, the lower the green innovation efficiency? Evidence from China's energy-intensive industries

Shuzhen Zhou, Feng Peng, Cong Yu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Promoting green innovation in energy-intensive industries is of strategic significance for achieving sustainable economic and social development. However, the role of government subsidies in improving green innovation efficiency (GIE) remains unclear. This study employs a combined approach—network DEA, regression analysis, Bootstrap method, and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)—to examine the complex effects of government subsidies on GIE in energy-intensive sectors. Results show that, from a net effect perspective, high levels of government subsidies have a significant negative impact on GIE. This adverse effect is mitigated by market competition. In contrast, configurational analysis reveals that high government subsidies are not a necessary condition for achieving high GIE. One configuration leads to high efficiency under high-subsidy conditions, while two distinct pathways emerge under non-high subsidy regimes, indicating equifinality. These findings suggest that the relationship between government subsidies and GIE is not deterministic but depends on the interaction of multiple conditions—including market competition, and human resource. Rather than adopting uniform subsidy policies, policymakers should implement differentiated and context-sensitive strategies, strengthen market mechanisms, and optimize policy bundling. By combining net effect analysis and configurational effect analysis, this study provides a more comprehensive understanding of how government subsidies influence GIE. It advances analytical methods in green innovation research and offers empirical support for refining subsidy policies in energy-intensive sectors. • Regression analysis and QCA are utilized to explore the role of government subsidies. • Market competition mitigates the negative impact of government subsidies on GIE. • Government subsidies are not a necessary condition for achieving high GIE. • Achieving high GIE depends on the configuration of multiple influencing factors.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 64
China Three Gorges University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Innovation Policy and R&D
99.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.