A Chequered History but Positive Future for British Public Administration
ABSTRACT Public services, public servants, and the study of Public Administration are operating in a context of global turbulence. Our review of the state of the discipline suggests that a core strength of British Public Administration has been the complementarity between scholarship and practice, responding to existential threats. We analyze changing relationships between the discipline and practice in British public administration over three eras: Applied, fragmented, and impactful. The applied era saw mutual exchange, but a lack of criticality. The fragmented era was one of a retreat to over‐specialization and identity crises. The impactful era has tried to revivify synergies but has struggled for coherence and criticality. Looking to the future, the nascent sub‐field of Positive Public Administration is identified as providing an opportunity to radically redefine the scientific quality and social relevance of the discipline due to the way it blends constructive engagement with independent criticality.
Authors
- Catherine Durose (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1712-9914)
- John Boswell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-8791)
- Matthew Flinders (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-9010)
- Liz Richardson
- Ian C Elliott
- Sarah A Ayres
- Steve Martin
- Paul Cairney
Institutions
- University of Stirling (GB)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- University of Wales (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Public Administration Review
- Published
- 2026-02-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70094
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Public Policy and Administration Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 78.50