A Chequered History but Positive Future for British Public Administration

ABSTRACT Public services, public servants, and the study of Public Administration are operating in a context of global turbulence. Our review of the state of the discipline suggests that a core strength of British Public Administration has been the complementarity between scholarship and practice, responding to existential threats. We analyze changing relationships between the discipline and practice in British public administration over three eras: Applied, fragmented, and impactful. The applied era saw mutual exchange, but a lack of criticality. The fragmented era was one of a retreat to over‐specialization and identity crises. The impactful era has tried to revivify synergies but has struggled for coherence and criticality. Looking to the future, the nascent sub‐field of Positive Public Administration is identified as providing an opportunity to radically redefine the scientific quality and social relevance of the discipline due to the way it blends constructive engagement with independent criticality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70094
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
78.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Chequered History but Positive Future for British Public Administration

Catherine Durose, John Boswell, Matthew Flinders, Liz Richardson et al.
1 citations
Public Administration Review
Public Policy and Administration Research
78.50
article

A Chequered History but Positive Future for British Public Administration

Catherine Durose, John Boswell, Matthew Flinders, Liz Richardson, Ian C Elliott, Sarah A Ayres, Steve Martin, Paul Cairney
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Public services, public servants, and the study of Public Administration are operating in a context of global turbulence. Our review of the state of the discipline suggests that a core strength of British Public Administration has been the complementarity between scholarship and practice, responding to existential threats. We analyze changing relationships between the discipline and practice in British public administration over three eras: Applied, fragmented, and impactful. The applied era saw mutual exchange, but a lack of criticality. The fragmented era was one of a retreat to over‐specialization and identity crises. The impactful era has tried to revivify synergies but has struggled for coherence and criticality. Looking to the future, the nascent sub‐field of Positive Public Administration is identified as providing an opportunity to radically redefine the scientific quality and social relevance of the discipline due to the way it blends constructive engagement with independent criticality.

Public Administration Review
University of Stirling (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of Southampton (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), Cardiff University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB), University of Wales (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Public Policy and Administration Research
78.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Chequered History but Positive Future for British Public Administration — Catherine Durose, John Boswell, et al. · Public Administration Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS