Poster Session II - A285 RISK OF COLECTOMY AFTER APPENDECTOMY IN ESTABLISHED ULCERATIVE COLITIS: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by relapsing-remitting inflammation of the colon and rectum. Current management focuses on inducing and maintaining clinical and endoscopic remission to prevent complications like colectomy. Recent studies suggest the appendix may play an immunomodulatory role. Several studies have suggested those with appendectomy may be at lower risk of developing UC. Preliminary studies indicate there may even be a role for appendectomy in those with established UC, but its clinical effectiveness in established UC remains unclear. Aims This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the association of appendectomy and longer-term risk of colectomy in patients with established UC. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception without date restrictions, including randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting colectomy rates in patients with established UC who had appendectomy after their diagnosis of UC compared to patients without appendectomy. Primary outcome was rate of colectomy after appendectomy. Secondary outcomes included flare frequency, treatment response, need for steroids or change in medications. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis, with heterogeneity assessed via I2 and chi-squared tests. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tools. Results We included 10 studies (1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 9 observational studies) (Table 1) from 1120 citations. Seven studies were eligible for inclusion with the meta-analysis, with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 78.02%, p = 0.0001). There was no significant association between appendectomy and odds of colectomy (OR 1.265, 95% CI 0.588–2.721, p = 0.547) (Table 2). Subgroup analyses by disease activity (active vs. remission) and UC extent were limited by data variability. Conclusions Current evidence does not suggest a therapeutic benefit for appendectomy to lower rates of colectomy in those with established UC. Further data is needed to understand its role for induction and maintenance of remission. A285 Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the included studies Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.284
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session II - A285 RISK OF COLECTOMY AFTER APPENDECTOMY IN ESTABLISHED ULCERATIVE COLITIS: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Sunil Samnani, S Siyad, H AlAwadhi, N Narula
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Poster Session II - A285 RISK OF COLECTOMY AFTER APPENDECTOMY IN ESTABLISHED ULCERATIVE COLITIS: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Sunil Samnani, S Siyad, H AlAwadhi, N Narula
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by relapsing-remitting inflammation of the colon and rectum. Current management focuses on inducing and maintaining clinical and endoscopic remission to prevent complications like colectomy. Recent studies suggest the appendix may play an immunomodulatory role. Several studies have suggested those with appendectomy may be at lower risk of developing UC. Preliminary studies indicate there may even be a role for appendectomy in those with established UC, but its clinical effectiveness in established UC remains unclear. Aims This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the association of appendectomy and longer-term risk of colectomy in patients with established UC. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception without date restrictions, including randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting colectomy rates in patients with established UC who had appendectomy after their diagnosis of UC compared to patients without appendectomy. Primary outcome was rate of colectomy after appendectomy. Secondary outcomes included flare frequency, treatment response, need for steroids or change in medications. Data were synthesized using random-effects meta-analysis, with heterogeneity assessed via I2 and chi-squared tests. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tools. Results We included 10 studies (1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 9 observational studies) (Table 1) from 1120 citations. Seven studies were eligible for inclusion with the meta-analysis, with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 78.02%, p = 0.0001). There was no significant association between appendectomy and odds of colectomy (OR 1.265, 95% CI 0.588–2.721, p = 0.547) (Table 2). Subgroup analyses by disease activity (active vs. remission) and UC extent were limited by data variability. Conclusions Current evidence does not suggest a therapeutic benefit for appendectomy to lower rates of colectomy in those with established UC. Further data is needed to understand its role for induction and maintenance of remission. A285 Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the included studies Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.