Machine learning-based analysis of economic efficiency disparities and transition drivers between high- and low-carbon industries in China

In the context of global climate change, understanding economic efficiency disparities between high-carbon and low-carbon industries is crucial for advancing low-carbon transitions and improving carbon governance. This study examines heterogeneity in corporate carbon emission management and economic performance across Chinese industries and identifies key drivers of firms' transformation capacity. Using a panel dataset of 633 listed enterprises from eight industries in China over 2010-2021, we classify firms into high- and low-carbon groups based on their emissions profiles and benchmark four machine-learning models-Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Decision Tree-to capture nonlinear relationships and evaluate the relative importance of environmental and financial indicators. Random Forest delivers the best performance, achieving a classification accuracy of 95.7% (rounded) and strong discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.989). Feature-importance results consistently show that carbon emissions are the most influential variable, followed by total liabilities and total assets, while profitability-related indicators (e.g., operating revenue and gross profit margin) also contribute to distinguishing firms' carbon profiles and performance differences. Overall, high-carbon enterprises appear to face greater transition barriers due to higher abatement cost exposure and tighter balance-sheet constraints, whereas low-carbon firms may be better positioned to benefit from policy incentives and market opportunities. These findings highlight the pivotal role of financial health in enabling low-carbon transformation and underscore the need for differentiated policy design. Policy implications include targeted transition finance and more flexible allowance allocation mechanisms for high-carbon enterprises, alongside continued incentives for technological innovation and market expansion in low-carbon sectors. JEL CLASSIFICATION: Q56; G30; C55; Q43; L60.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carbon Balance and Management
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-025-00393-2
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning-based analysis of economic efficiency disparities and transition drivers between high- and low-carbon industries in China

Qianyi Zhang, Zhilin Huang, Enliang Tian, Yayin Zheng
Carbon Balance and Management
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Machine learning-based analysis of economic efficiency disparities and transition drivers between high- and low-carbon industries in China

Qianyi Zhang, Zhilin Huang, Enliang Tian, Yayin Zheng
article en

Abstract

In the context of global climate change, understanding economic efficiency disparities between high-carbon and low-carbon industries is crucial for advancing low-carbon transitions and improving carbon governance. This study examines heterogeneity in corporate carbon emission management and economic performance across Chinese industries and identifies key drivers of firms' transformation capacity. Using a panel dataset of 633 listed enterprises from eight industries in China over 2010-2021, we classify firms into high- and low-carbon groups based on their emissions profiles and benchmark four machine-learning models-Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Decision Tree-to capture nonlinear relationships and evaluate the relative importance of environmental and financial indicators. Random Forest delivers the best performance, achieving a classification accuracy of 95.7% (rounded) and strong discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.989). Feature-importance results consistently show that carbon emissions are the most influential variable, followed by total liabilities and total assets, while profitability-related indicators (e.g., operating revenue and gross profit margin) also contribute to distinguishing firms' carbon profiles and performance differences. Overall, high-carbon enterprises appear to face greater transition barriers due to higher abatement cost exposure and tighter balance-sheet constraints, whereas low-carbon firms may be better positioned to benefit from policy incentives and market opportunities. These findings highlight the pivotal role of financial health in enabling low-carbon transformation and underscore the need for differentiated policy design. Policy implications include targeted transition finance and more flexible allowance allocation mechanisms for high-carbon enterprises, alongside continued incentives for technological innovation and market expansion in low-carbon sectors. JEL CLASSIFICATION: Q56; G30; C55; Q43; L60.

Carbon Balance and ManagementVol. 21(1)
Shantou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.