Effect of bonded lingual spurs with low trans palatal arch on developing anterior open bite (a randomized controlled trial)

Anterior Open Bite (AOB) is a complex malocclusion with esthetic, functional, and psychosocial implications, highlighting the need for early diagnosis and interceptive treatment. To compare the effectiveness of bonded Tongue Spurs combined with a Low Trans Palatal Arch (TS/LTPA) versus bonded Tongue Spurs (TS) alone in managing AOB associated with tongue habit during the mixed dentition stage. Fifty children were assessed for eligibility; 32 were randomized, and 30 completed the 6-month follow-up and were included in the final analysis. They aged 7 to 11 years (10 boys, 20 girls) in the mixed dentition phase, having a dentoskeletal AOB of at least 1 mm, an Angle Class I molar relationship, and CMI stages 2 and 3. TS/LTPA group comprised 16 patients (7 males and 9 females) exhibiting bonded lingual tongue spurs and a low transpalatal arch. TS group included 14 patients (3 males and 11 females) who had bondable lingual tongue spurs only. The mean age was 8.73 ± 1.00 years in the TS/LTPA group and 9.03 ± 0.68 years in the TS group. Digital lateral cephalograms and models were obtained prior to and six months post-treatment. Both groups (TS/LTPA and TS) showed improvement in overbite closure, with a median change of + 2.97 mm (IQR 1.16 to 5.00; p < .001) in the TS/LTPA group and + 3.67 mm (IQR 2.00 to 5.00; p = .001) in the TS group, respectively. However, the difference between groups was not statistically significant. A statistically significant vertical molar control was observed in the TS/LTPA group (+ 0.40 mm, IQR 0.30 to 0.65; p = .001) compared to the TS group (+ 0.90 mm, IQR 0.70 to 1.00; p = .001), with significant differences between both groups. Both TS/LTPA and TS groups showed a reduction in overbite, along with incisor extrusion and retroclination. The TS/LTPA group provided significantly better vertical molar control than the TS group; however, the difference in AOB closure between the groups was not statistically significant. This single-center randomized controlled trial received ethical approval from Alexandria University’s Research Ethics Committee, Alexandria, Egypt (IORG0008839, No. 0313 − 10/2021). This trial was retrospectively registered in the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR202403582913859) on 14 March 2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07717-9
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of bonded lingual spurs with low trans palatal arch on developing anterior open bite (a randomized controlled trial)

Tarek Yousry, Moataz Nasser, Hanan Ismail
BMC Oral Health
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Effect of bonded lingual spurs with low trans palatal arch on developing anterior open bite (a randomized controlled trial)

Tarek Yousry, Moataz Nasser, Hanan Ismail
article en

Abstract

Anterior Open Bite (AOB) is a complex malocclusion with esthetic, functional, and psychosocial implications, highlighting the need for early diagnosis and interceptive treatment. To compare the effectiveness of bonded Tongue Spurs combined with a Low Trans Palatal Arch (TS/LTPA) versus bonded Tongue Spurs (TS) alone in managing AOB associated with tongue habit during the mixed dentition stage. Fifty children were assessed for eligibility; 32 were randomized, and 30 completed the 6-month follow-up and were included in the final analysis. They aged 7 to 11 years (10 boys, 20 girls) in the mixed dentition phase, having a dentoskeletal AOB of at least 1 mm, an Angle Class I molar relationship, and CMI stages 2 and 3. TS/LTPA group comprised 16 patients (7 males and 9 females) exhibiting bonded lingual tongue spurs and a low transpalatal arch. TS group included 14 patients (3 males and 11 females) who had bondable lingual tongue spurs only. The mean age was 8.73 ± 1.00 years in the TS/LTPA group and 9.03 ± 0.68 years in the TS group. Digital lateral cephalograms and models were obtained prior to and six months post-treatment. Both groups (TS/LTPA and TS) showed improvement in overbite closure, with a median change of + 2.97 mm (IQR 1.16 to 5.00; p < .001) in the TS/LTPA group and + 3.67 mm (IQR 2.00 to 5.00; p = .001) in the TS group, respectively. However, the difference between groups was not statistically significant. A statistically significant vertical molar control was observed in the TS/LTPA group (+ 0.40 mm, IQR 0.30 to 0.65; p = .001) compared to the TS group (+ 0.90 mm, IQR 0.70 to 1.00; p = .001), with significant differences between both groups. Both TS/LTPA and TS groups showed a reduction in overbite, along with incisor extrusion and retroclination. The TS/LTPA group provided significantly better vertical molar control than the TS group; however, the difference in AOB closure between the groups was not statistically significant. This single-center randomized controlled trial received ethical approval from Alexandria University’s Research Ethics Committee, Alexandria, Egypt (IORG0008839, No. 0313 − 10/2021). This trial was retrospectively registered in the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR202403582913859) on 14 March 2024.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Alexandria University (EG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.