SWOT Geostrophic Velocity Validation Against In Situ Measurements in the California Current

Abstract The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission provides high‐resolution sea surface height (SSH) observations from the Ka‐band Radar Interferometer (KaRIn), with the potential to improve our understanding of ocean circulation dynamics. A key objective of SWOT is to convert SSH measurements into ocean currents, a process that requires rigorous validation beyond direct SSH assessment. In this study, we evaluated SWOT‐derived geostrophic velocities in the California Current System (CCS) at 125.044W, 35.917N by comparing them with in situ velocity measurements from a moored current meter array during the post‐launch Calibration and Validation (CalVal) phase (April 1–4 July 2023). During this period, SWOT operated in a special 1‐day repeat orbit, providing daily sampling that is not representative of the nominal 21‐day science orbit. To derive reliable velocities, SSH fields were low‐pass filtered at 70 km to suppress noise and unbalanced motions. Compared to the in situ velocities, SWOT explained up to 80% (43%) of the meridional (zonal) variance, outperforming DUACS, which explained 63% (15%). SWOT also better captured variability at periods longer than 6–10 days and resolved sharper mesoscale features than the DUACS gridded product, which resolves signals with time scales greater than 25–30 days. When the comparison was repeated using only one SWOT snapshot every 21 days, mimicking the science‐phase orbit, SWOT still retained meaningful skill in representing the velocity field. These results demonstrate SWOT's ability to improve mesoscale and large‐scale velocity estimation, while also highlighting the challenges in regions with strong internal gravity waves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth and Space Science
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ea004424
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SWOT Geostrophic Velocity Validation Against In Situ Measurements in the California Current

Luke Kachelein, Matthew Archer, Amy F. Waterhouse, Matthias Lankhorst et al.
Earth and Space Science
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
article

SWOT Geostrophic Velocity Validation Against In Situ Measurements in the California Current

Luke Kachelein, Matthew Archer, Amy F. Waterhouse, Matthias Lankhorst, Babette C. Tchonang, L-L. Fu, U. Send, C. A. Griffin, Jinbo Wang, Andrew J. Lucas, Jeffrey Sevadjian
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission provides high‐resolution sea surface height (SSH) observations from the Ka‐band Radar Interferometer (KaRIn), with the potential to improve our understanding of ocean circulation dynamics. A key objective of SWOT is to convert SSH measurements into ocean currents, a process that requires rigorous validation beyond direct SSH assessment. In this study, we evaluated SWOT‐derived geostrophic velocities in the California Current System (CCS) at 125.044W, 35.917N by comparing them with in situ velocity measurements from a moored current meter array during the post‐launch Calibration and Validation (CalVal) phase (April 1–4 July 2023). During this period, SWOT operated in a special 1‐day repeat orbit, providing daily sampling that is not representative of the nominal 21‐day science orbit. To derive reliable velocities, SSH fields were low‐pass filtered at 70 km to suppress noise and unbalanced motions. Compared to the in situ velocities, SWOT explained up to 80% (43%) of the meridional (zonal) variance, outperforming DUACS, which explained 63% (15%). SWOT also better captured variability at periods longer than 6–10 days and resolved sharper mesoscale features than the DUACS gridded product, which resolves signals with time scales greater than 25–30 days. When the comparison was repeated using only one SWOT snapshot every 21 days, mimicking the science‐phase orbit, SWOT still retained meaningful skill in representing the velocity field. These results demonstrate SWOT's ability to improve mesoscale and large‐scale velocity estimation, while also highlighting the challenges in regions with strong internal gravity waves.

Earth and Space ScienceVol. 13(2)
Florida State University (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), University of California San Diego (US), Texas A&M University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, California Institute of Technology, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Office of Naval Research
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.