Clinical performance of two commercial PCR assays for the detection of macrolide resistance in <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i>

Macrolides are the first-line treatment for <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> infections; however, macrolide resistance has been reported. We evaluated the clinical performance of two commercial assays for detecting macrolide-resistant <i>M. pneumoniae</i>: the LightMix Modular <i>Mycoplasma Macrolide</i> (TIB Molbiol) and the <i>Mycoplasma Pneumoniae</i> and Macrolides-Resistant Strain Nucleic Acid Test Kit (Mole Bioscience), using 23S rRNA Sanger sequencing as the reference method. Eight <i>M. pneumoniae</i> strains, 10 non-<i>M</i>. <i>pneumoniae Mycoplasma</i> strains, and 237 clinical samples were tested. Overall, the Mole Bioscience kit failed to detect <i>M. pneumoniae</i> in 27.7% of positive samples, whereas the TIB Molbiol kit missed only 5.1%. The clinical sensitivities for detecting macrolide resistance-associated mutations in clinical samples were 90.9% for the TIB Molbiol kit and 81.5% for the Mole Bioscience kit. All false wild-type results corresponded to samples harboring a mutation at position 2067 (<i>M. pneumoniae</i> numbering) of the 23S rRNA gene. The clinical specificities were 97.9% and 94.4% for the TIB Molbiol and Mole Bioscience kits, respectively. Notably, the TIB Molbiol kit also detected 23S rRNA mutations in <i>Mycoplasma genitalium</i> and <i>Mycoplasma amphoriforme</i>, whereas the Mole Bioscience kit yielded false-resistant results in high-load specimens. In conclusion, these commercial kits offer a convenient approach for detecting macrolide resistance in routine clinical practice. The Mole Bioscience kit demonstrated limited sensitivity for <i>M. pneumoniae</i> detection, restricting its utility for resistance identification, and neither assay reliably detected resistance-associated mutations at position 2067. The global <i>M. pneumoniae</i> reemergence highlights the need for advanced assays detecting all macrolide resistance-associated mutations.IMPORTANCE<i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> is a leading cause of bacterial respiratory tract infections, and a marked resurgence was reported worldwide in autumn 2023. Macrolides are the recommended first-line treatment for <i>M. pneumoniae</i> infections; however, resistance rates vary widely across regions and may compromise therapeutic efficacy. Rapid identification of macrolide resistance is therefore critical to ensure appropriate patient management. Because culture-based methods are slow and have limited sensitivity, molecular assays have become central to both pathogen detection and resistance determination. However, few simple and reliable commercial assays have been developed and evaluated for the detection of macrolide resistance in routine diagnostic laboratories. In this study, we evaluated the clinical performance of two real-time PCR-based commercial assays for detecting macrolide resistance-associated mutations in <i>M. pneumoniae</i>. Our findings support the implementation of rapid molecular tools to guide timely therapeutic decisions, including the early use of second-line antimicrobials when resistance is detected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01491-25
Primary Topic
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical performance of two commercial PCR assays for the detection of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae

Jennifer Guiraud, Alicia Silvant, Marie Gardette, Nadège Hénin et al.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
article

Clinical performance of two commercial PCR assays for the detection of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae

Jennifer Guiraud, Alicia Silvant, Marie Gardette, Nadège Hénin, Carla Balcon, Cécile Bébéar, Sabine Pereyre
article en

Abstract

Macrolides are the first-line treatment for <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> infections; however, macrolide resistance has been reported. We evaluated the clinical performance of two commercial assays for detecting macrolide-resistant <i>M. pneumoniae</i>: the LightMix Modular <i>Mycoplasma Macrolide</i> (TIB Molbiol) and the <i>Mycoplasma Pneumoniae</i> and Macrolides-Resistant Strain Nucleic Acid Test Kit (Mole Bioscience), using 23S rRNA Sanger sequencing as the reference method. Eight <i>M. pneumoniae</i> strains, 10 non-<i>M</i>. <i>pneumoniae Mycoplasma</i> strains, and 237 clinical samples were tested. Overall, the Mole Bioscience kit failed to detect <i>M. pneumoniae</i> in 27.7% of positive samples, whereas the TIB Molbiol kit missed only 5.1%. The clinical sensitivities for detecting macrolide resistance-associated mutations in clinical samples were 90.9% for the TIB Molbiol kit and 81.5% for the Mole Bioscience kit. All false wild-type results corresponded to samples harboring a mutation at position 2067 (<i>M. pneumoniae</i> numbering) of the 23S rRNA gene. The clinical specificities were 97.9% and 94.4% for the TIB Molbiol and Mole Bioscience kits, respectively. Notably, the TIB Molbiol kit also detected 23S rRNA mutations in <i>Mycoplasma genitalium</i> and <i>Mycoplasma amphoriforme</i>, whereas the Mole Bioscience kit yielded false-resistant results in high-load specimens. In conclusion, these commercial kits offer a convenient approach for detecting macrolide resistance in routine clinical practice. The Mole Bioscience kit demonstrated limited sensitivity for <i>M. pneumoniae</i> detection, restricting its utility for resistance identification, and neither assay reliably detected resistance-associated mutations at position 2067. The global <i>M. pneumoniae</i> reemergence highlights the need for advanced assays detecting all macrolide resistance-associated mutations.IMPORTANCE<i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> is a leading cause of bacterial respiratory tract infections, and a marked resurgence was reported worldwide in autumn 2023. Macrolides are the recommended first-line treatment for <i>M. pneumoniae</i> infections; however, resistance rates vary widely across regions and may compromise therapeutic efficacy. Rapid identification of macrolide resistance is therefore critical to ensure appropriate patient management. Because culture-based methods are slow and have limited sensitivity, molecular assays have become central to both pathogen detection and resistance determination. However, few simple and reliable commercial assays have been developed and evaluated for the detection of macrolide resistance in routine diagnostic laboratories. In this study, we evaluated the clinical performance of two real-time PCR-based commercial assays for detecting macrolide resistance-associated mutations in <i>M. pneumoniae</i>. Our findings support the implementation of rapid molecular tools to guide timely therapeutic decisions, including the early use of second-line antimicrobials when resistance is detected.

Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyVol. 64(3)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.