Impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background/Aims: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely prescribed for diabetes and obesity. Recent studies suggest they may negatively affect bowel preparation quality before colonoscopy (CLN), leading to inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) and repeat procedures. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess this association.Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases, along with abstracts from Digestive Disease Week 2024 and the American College of Gastroenterology Meeting 2024, were searched. Outcomes included IBP, repeat CLNs, and the mean difference in Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores between GLP-1 RA users and non-users. Adjusted odds ratios (OR), for age, sex, body mass index, and diabetes, were pooled.Results: Twelve studies including 123,858 patients (57,699 GLP-1 RA users) were analyzed. GLP-1 RA use was associated with higher IBP risk (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.11–2.16); adjusted analyses confirmed this (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.02–2.74). BBPS scores were lower among GLP-1 RA users (mean difference, –0.68; 95% CI, –0.77 to –0.58). No association with repeat CLNs was observed (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.88–2.56).Conclusions: GLP-1 RA use is linked to inadequate bowel preparation but not repeat CLNs. Further prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate this finding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Endoscopy
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.137
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nadera Altork, Dania Qarkash, Lindsay Ayers, Ghaith Almhanni et al.
Clinical Endoscopy
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nadera Altork, Dania Qarkash, Lindsay Ayers, Ghaith Almhanni, Ahmad Abdulraheem, Kiandokht Bashiri, Usman Afzal, Won Kyoo Cho, Qusai Al-Zureikat, Peppas Spyros, Bara Abujaber
article en

Abstract

Background/Aims: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely prescribed for diabetes and obesity. Recent studies suggest they may negatively affect bowel preparation quality before colonoscopy (CLN), leading to inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) and repeat procedures. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess this association.Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases, along with abstracts from Digestive Disease Week 2024 and the American College of Gastroenterology Meeting 2024, were searched. Outcomes included IBP, repeat CLNs, and the mean difference in Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores between GLP-1 RA users and non-users. Adjusted odds ratios (OR), for age, sex, body mass index, and diabetes, were pooled.Results: Twelve studies including 123,858 patients (57,699 GLP-1 RA users) were analyzed. GLP-1 RA use was associated with higher IBP risk (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.11–2.16); adjusted analyses confirmed this (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.02–2.74). BBPS scores were lower among GLP-1 RA users (mean difference, –0.68; 95% CI, –0.77 to –0.58). No association with repeat CLNs was observed (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.88–2.56).Conclusions: GLP-1 RA use is linked to inadequate bowel preparation but not repeat CLNs. Further prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate this finding.

Clinical EndoscopyVol. 59(2)
University of Jordan (JO), MedStar Washington Hospital Center (US), Georgetown University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.