The Decision Process Scale (DPS): Self-report measures of reliance on rules, cost–benefit reasoning, intuition, and deliberation in (moral) decision-making

Understanding how people make decisions in specific situations is a central challenge in (moral) psychology research. Yet there are no existing self-report scales for measuring the process of decision-making in individual dilemmas (as opposed to general moral attitudes or beliefs about moral decision-making). We address this gap by devising new self-report measures of several of the processes by which people make moral decisions and validate them using realistic moral dilemmas, including six new vignettes that we developed. The resulting 12-item Decision Process Scale (DPS) can be used to measure how much people rely on rules versus cost-benefit reasoning and how much they rely on intuition versus deliberation in the specific moral dilemmas they face in a laboratory experiment or in the real world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02933-7
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Decision Process Scale (DPS): Self-report measures of reliance on rules, cost–benefit reasoning, intuition, and deliberation in (moral) decision-making

Falk Lieder, Maximilian Maier, Vanessa Cheung
Behavior Research Methods
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

The Decision Process Scale (DPS): Self-report measures of reliance on rules, cost–benefit reasoning, intuition, and deliberation in (moral) decision-making

Falk Lieder, Maximilian Maier, Vanessa Cheung
article en

Abstract

Understanding how people make decisions in specific situations is a central challenge in (moral) psychology research. Yet there are no existing self-report scales for measuring the process of decision-making in individual dilemmas (as opposed to general moral attitudes or beliefs about moral decision-making). We address this gap by devising new self-report measures of several of the processes by which people make moral decisions and validate them using realistic moral dilemmas, including six new vignettes that we developed. The resulting 12-item Decision Process Scale (DPS) can be used to measure how much people rely on rules versus cost-benefit reasoning and how much they rely on intuition versus deliberation in the specific moral dilemmas they face in a laboratory experiment or in the real world.

Behavior Research MethodsVol. 58(2)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Warwick (GB), Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems (DE), University College London (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Decision Process Scale (DPS): Self-report measures of reliance on rules, cost–benefit reasoning, intuition, and deliberation in (moral) decision-making — Falk Lieder, Maximilian Maier, et al. · Behavior Research Methods (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS