The Decision Process Scale (DPS): Self-report measures of reliance on rules, cost–benefit reasoning, intuition, and deliberation in (moral) decision-making
Understanding how people make decisions in specific situations is a central challenge in (moral) psychology research. Yet there are no existing self-report scales for measuring the process of decision-making in individual dilemmas (as opposed to general moral attitudes or beliefs about moral decision-making). We address this gap by devising new self-report measures of several of the processes by which people make moral decisions and validate them using realistic moral dilemmas, including six new vignettes that we developed. The resulting 12-item Decision Process Scale (DPS) can be used to measure how much people rely on rules versus cost-benefit reasoning and how much they rely on intuition versus deliberation in the specific moral dilemmas they face in a laboratory experiment or in the real world.
Authors
- Falk Lieder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2746-6110)
- Maximilian Maier
- Vanessa Cheung
Institutions
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems (DE)
- University College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2026-02-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02933-7
- Primary Topic
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00