Trans-fracture approach of intra-body supporter implantation for thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures:a technical note and 18 cases with 2-year follow-up

Vertebral body height loss happens after restoration due to insufficient support. This note described a novel technique for the restoration of vertebral compression fracture (VCF). The feasibility and safety of the proposed surgical technique were proved. This is a prospective study including patients from May 2022 to May 2023. Non-osteoporotic VCF patients were treated with trans-fracture intra-vertebral body fusion (TFIF) surgery. Patients who met the following criteria were included: (1) age < 55 years; (2) single-level VCF with or without neurologic symptoms; (3) reduced anterior vertebral body height > 20% measured from lateral X-ray radiography; (4) A1 and A3 VCF of AO type; (5) written informed consent. Cases with fractures caused by infection and tumor, and a history of inter-body fusion procedure were excluded, as well as patients with a follow-up period of less than 1 year. The anterior vertebral height proportion (AVBH), median vertebral height proportion (MVBH), posterior vertebral height proportion (PVBH), Cobb angle, wedge angle, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were measured at any follow-up time point. Differences between pre- and post-operation, and post-operation and final follow-up time points were compared through a paired Wilcoxon test (non-normal distribution data) or a paired t test (normal distribution data). A total of 18 patients, aged (47.9 ± 7.8) years, were finally included in the study with an average follow-up period of (24.8 ± 5.4) months. The TFIF surgery restored AVBH, MVBH, and PVBH from 0.594 ± 0.090 to 0.927 ± 0.052, 0.626 ± 0.114 to 0.910 ± 0.077, and 0.899 ± 0.067 to 0.970 ± 0.034, respectively (all p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the AVBH, MVBH, and PVBH were maintained well from immediate post-operation to final follow-up: 0.927 ± 0.052 vs . 0.927 ± 0.039, 0.910 ± 0.077 vs . 0.921 ± 0.047, and 0.970 ± 0.034 vs . 0.978 ± 0.031, respectively. Cobb angle and wedge angle lost slightly from immediate post-operation to final follow-up: 4.21° ± 4.02° vs . 6.41° ± 3.83°, and 5.49° ± 9.61° vs . 7.99° ± 12.51°, respectively. The TFIF surgery relieved pain efficiently (7.94 ± 0.54 vs . 4.89 ± 0.58, p < 0.001). The TFIF surgery restored the vertebral height almost completely. The cage supported and maintained vertebral height in the long-term with a slight loss. Thus, the TFIF surgery is a safe and feasible approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Journal of Traumatology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2026.01.003
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trans-fracture approach of intra-body supporter implantation for thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures:a technical note and 18 cases with 2-year follow-up

Y D Li, Zhen Zhang, Jun (Justin) Li, Jianhui Fan et al.
Chinese Journal of Traumatology
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Trans-fracture approach of intra-body supporter implantation for thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures:a technical note and 18 cases with 2-year follow-up

Y D Li, Zhen Zhang, Jun (Justin) Li, Jianhui Fan, Shulin Zheng, Xianming Huang, Qin He, Ya Cheng, Hong Wang
article en

Abstract

Vertebral body height loss happens after restoration due to insufficient support. This note described a novel technique for the restoration of vertebral compression fracture (VCF). The feasibility and safety of the proposed surgical technique were proved. This is a prospective study including patients from May 2022 to May 2023. Non-osteoporotic VCF patients were treated with trans-fracture intra-vertebral body fusion (TFIF) surgery. Patients who met the following criteria were included: (1) age < 55 years; (2) single-level VCF with or without neurologic symptoms; (3) reduced anterior vertebral body height > 20% measured from lateral X-ray radiography; (4) A1 and A3 VCF of AO type; (5) written informed consent. Cases with fractures caused by infection and tumor, and a history of inter-body fusion procedure were excluded, as well as patients with a follow-up period of less than 1 year. The anterior vertebral height proportion (AVBH), median vertebral height proportion (MVBH), posterior vertebral height proportion (PVBH), Cobb angle, wedge angle, and visual analogue scale (VAS) were measured at any follow-up time point. Differences between pre- and post-operation, and post-operation and final follow-up time points were compared through a paired Wilcoxon test (non-normal distribution data) or a paired t test (normal distribution data). A total of 18 patients, aged (47.9 ± 7.8) years, were finally included in the study with an average follow-up period of (24.8 ± 5.4) months. The TFIF surgery restored AVBH, MVBH, and PVBH from 0.594 ± 0.090 to 0.927 ± 0.052, 0.626 ± 0.114 to 0.910 ± 0.077, and 0.899 ± 0.067 to 0.970 ± 0.034, respectively (all p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the AVBH, MVBH, and PVBH were maintained well from immediate post-operation to final follow-up: 0.927 ± 0.052 vs . 0.927 ± 0.039, 0.910 ± 0.077 vs . 0.921 ± 0.047, and 0.970 ± 0.034 vs . 0.978 ± 0.031, respectively. Cobb angle and wedge angle lost slightly from immediate post-operation to final follow-up: 4.21° ± 4.02° vs . 6.41° ± 3.83°, and 5.49° ± 9.61° vs . 7.99° ± 12.51°, respectively. The TFIF surgery relieved pain efficiently (7.94 ± 0.54 vs . 4.89 ± 0.58, p < 0.001). The TFIF surgery restored the vertebral height almost completely. The cage supported and maintained vertebral height in the long-term with a slight loss. Thus, the TFIF surgery is a safe and feasible approach.

Chinese Journal of Traumatology
Army Medical University (CN), Dalian Medical University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Panzhihua Central Hospital (CN), Dazhou Central Hospital (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.