Vector‐Based Comparison and Average Slope Can Refine Bioequivalence Claims: A Machine and Deep Learning Approach

This study explored the advantages of two innovative concepts: AS and VBC. AS is a pharmacokinetic parameter that measures absorption rates, whereas VBC analyzes clinical endpoints as vectors, breaking them into independent components. Together, these methods aim to improve the accuracy and efficiency of bioequivalence (BE) studies. The performance of AS and VBC was assessed using 14 actual datasets. The study applied both standard statistical methods required by regulatory authorities and advanced techniques, including machine learning and artificial neural networks. The findings showed that combining AS and VBC accurately measures absorption rates while reducing variability. This approach enhances statistical power, addresses multiplicity issues, and supports smaller sample sizes. These improvements simplify BE studies, lower costs, and shorten completion times. The joint use of AS and VBC provides a precise and efficient method for defining absorption rates in BE studies. These methods improve study outcomes while reducing the resources and time required, making them valuable tools for modern BE analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdd.70023
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vector‐Based Comparison and Average Slope Can Refine Bioequivalence Claims: A Machine and Deep Learning Approach

Vangelis Karalis, Maria Kokkali
Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Vector‐Based Comparison and Average Slope Can Refine Bioequivalence Claims: A Machine and Deep Learning Approach

Vangelis Karalis, Maria Kokkali
article en

Abstract

This study explored the advantages of two innovative concepts: AS and VBC. AS is a pharmacokinetic parameter that measures absorption rates, whereas VBC analyzes clinical endpoints as vectors, breaking them into independent components. Together, these methods aim to improve the accuracy and efficiency of bioequivalence (BE) studies. The performance of AS and VBC was assessed using 14 actual datasets. The study applied both standard statistical methods required by regulatory authorities and advanced techniques, including machine learning and artificial neural networks. The findings showed that combining AS and VBC accurately measures absorption rates while reducing variability. This approach enhances statistical power, addresses multiplicity issues, and supports smaller sample sizes. These improvements simplify BE studies, lower costs, and shorten completion times. The joint use of AS and VBC provides a precise and efficient method for defining absorption rates in BE studies. These methods improve study outcomes while reducing the resources and time required, making them valuable tools for modern BE analysis.

Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.