Large language models provide unsafe answers to patient-posed medical questions

Millions of patients are regularly using large language model (LLM) chatbots for medical advice, raising patient safety concerns. This physician-led red-teaming study compares the safety of four publicly available chatbots-Claude by Anthropic, Gemini by Google, GPT-4o by OpenAI, and Llama-3.0/3.1-70B by Meta-on a new dataset, HealthAdvice, using an evaluation framework that enables quantitative and qualitative analysis. In total, 888 chatbot responses are evaluated for 222 patient-posed advice-seeking medical questions on primary care topics spanning internal medicine, women's health, and pediatrics. We find statistically significant differences between chatbots. The rate of problematic responses varies from 21.6% (Claude) to 43.2% (Llama), with unsafe responses varying from 5% (Claude) to 13% (GPT-4o, Llama). Qualitative results reveal chatbot responses with the potential to lead to serious patient harm. This study suggests that millions of patients could be receiving unsafe medical advice from publicly available chatbots, and further work is needed to improve the clinical safety of these powerful tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02428-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large language models provide unsafe answers to patient-posed medical questions

Aswathy Vaikom House, Jessica Evert, Rachel Lea Draelos, Heather Gardner et al.
2 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
35.40
article

Large language models provide unsafe answers to patient-posed medical questions

Aswathy Vaikom House, Jessica Evert, Rachel Lea Draelos, Heather Gardner, Zahraa Rabeeah, Kirshma Khemani, Lauren Herrmann, Barbara Blasko, Dimple Patel Desai, Stephanie Kass, Samina Afreen, Lauren M. McDonald, Amanda Koire, Marianne Kavan, Natasha Chase, Amy Shah, Tiffany L. Brazile
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Millions of patients are regularly using large language model (LLM) chatbots for medical advice, raising patient safety concerns. This physician-led red-teaming study compares the safety of four publicly available chatbots-Claude by Anthropic, Gemini by Google, GPT-4o by OpenAI, and Llama-3.0/3.1-70B by Meta-on a new dataset, HealthAdvice, using an evaluation framework that enables quantitative and qualitative analysis. In total, 888 chatbot responses are evaluated for 222 patient-posed advice-seeking medical questions on primary care topics spanning internal medicine, women's health, and pediatrics. We find statistically significant differences between chatbots. The rate of problematic responses varies from 21.6% (Claude) to 43.2% (Llama), with unsafe responses varying from 5% (Claude) to 13% (GPT-4o, Llama). Qualitative results reveal chatbot responses with the potential to lead to serious patient harm. This study suggests that millions of patients could be receiving unsafe medical advice from publicly available chatbots, and further work is needed to improve the clinical safety of these powerful tools.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 9(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Northwell Health (US), University of Louisville (US), Emory University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Inova Fairfax Hospital (US), Cooper University Hospital (US), Riverside Community Hospital (US), Brownsville Public Library (US), California Wellness Foundation (US), Institute of Glass (RU), University of Teacher Education Zug (CH), Piedmont HealthCare (US), University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US), University of Virginia (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
35.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.