No Hitting: Effects of a Ban on Corporal Punishment for Students With Disabilities

Fifteen states allow corporal punishment in public schools, which occurred nearly 100,000 times in 2017–2018, disproportionately involving students with disabilities (SWDs). While Southern legislatures have rejected multiple attempts to ban the practice outright, six states recently restricted corporal punishment specifically for SWDs. There is scant research on these restrictions, including on compliance and whether schools replaced corporal punishment with suspensions. Using a triple difference, I estimate the impacts of Louisiana’s 2017 corporal punishment ban for SWDs. The ban significantly reduced corporal punishment for SWDs, though compliance was imperfect. I find no evidence of an increase in suspensions, suggesting that policymakers need not choose between exclusionary and physical discipline. I conclude with implications for monitoring and accountability in discipline reforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737251407602
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No Hitting: Effects of a Ban on Corporal Punishment for Students With Disabilities

Todd W. Hall
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

No Hitting: Effects of a Ban on Corporal Punishment for Students With Disabilities

Todd W. Hall
article en

Abstract

Fifteen states allow corporal punishment in public schools, which occurred nearly 100,000 times in 2017–2018, disproportionately involving students with disabilities (SWDs). While Southern legislatures have rejected multiple attempts to ban the practice outright, six states recently restricted corporal punishment specifically for SWDs. There is scant research on these restrictions, including on compliance and whether schools replaced corporal punishment with suspensions. Using a triple difference, I estimate the impacts of Louisiana’s 2017 corporal punishment ban for SWDs. The ban significantly reduced corporal punishment for SWDs, though compliance was imperfect. I find no evidence of an increase in suspensions, suggesting that policymakers need not choose between exclusionary and physical discipline. I conclude with implications for monitoring and accountability in discipline reforms.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
University of Virginia (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.