Poster Session I – Poster of Distinction - A96 ADHERENCE TO PAST AND CONTEMPORARY POST-POLYPECTOMY SURVEILLANCE GUIDELINES

Abstract Background United States MultiSociety TaskForce (USMSTF) guidelines addressing post-polypectomy colonoscopy intervals were issued in 2012 and modified in 2020. Aims Assess post-polypectomy surveillance intervals adherence to USMSTF 2012 and 2020 recommendations. Methods We included patients with a past personal or index colonoscopy history of colon polyps from two tertiary hospitals. Procedural reports were reviewed and patients stratified according to index colonoscopy findings into: normal colonoscopy, 1–2 small (<10 mm) adenomas, 3–4 small adenomas, 5–10 polyps, >10 polyps, ≥1 adenoma ≥10 mm, at least one adenoma with high grade dysplasia, or a serrated polyp with dysplasia, or a traditional serrated adenoma. Recommended follow-up intervals were classified as earlier, later or adherent to 2020 guidelines, and compared to 2012 recommendations. Results Overall, 5,204 colonoscopies were included over 47 months. When the first follow-up index colonoscopy was normal (n = 963), adherence to follow-up was only 7.9% as per both guidelines, i.e.: 86.7% scheduled sooner than recommended (<10 years). For patients with 1–2 adenomas (<10 mm) (n = 2,388), adherence was 71.4% according to 2012 guidelines (5 years) but fell to 3.3% with 2020 recommendations (7-10 years); most patients were still assigned a 5-year follow-up (87.1%). For 3–4 small adenomas (<10 mm) (n = 505), adherence was 47.6% for 2020 guidelines (3-5 years). When >10 polyps were removed (n = 22), there was better compliance, with adherence rates of 86.4% according to 2012 guidelines (< 3 years) and 50.0% for the 2020 recommendations (1 year). For lesions requiring a 3-year surveillance interval common to both guideline era, adherence was 39.5% for polyps ≥10 mm, 22.9% for villous/tubulovillous histology with/without high grade dysplasia, 27.1% for adenoma with high grade dysplasia, 12.5% for sessile serrated polyps with dysplasia, and 15.4% for traditional serrated adenomas. All non-adherent recommendations suggested a colonoscopy sooner than the recommended intervals, except for those with villous/tubulovillous histology with or without dysplasia, among whom 55.7% were later than the recommended post-polypectomy colonoscopy intervals. Conclusions Continued practice according to earlier-surveillance interval persist, particularly for low-risk patients with a normal colonoscopy or 1–2 small adenomas, despite the revises 7–10 year extended interval recommendations in 2020. Adherence for high-risk findings was moderate and unchanged, while delayed follow-up was most frequent among patients with villous or tubulovillous adenomas. There is a need for improved implementation of societal recommendations to ensure optimal evidence-based surveillance practices in the face of what are often limited colonoscopy resources. Funding Agencies The study as been funded by the CPAC

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.096
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session I – Poster of Distinction - A96 ADHERENCE TO PAST AND CONTEMPORARY POST-POLYPECTOMY SURVEILLANCE GUIDELINES

Saro Aprikian, Charles Ménard, C Hansen-Barkun, A N Barkun et al.
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Poster Session I – Poster of Distinction - A96 ADHERENCE TO PAST AND CONTEMPORARY POST-POLYPECTOMY SURVEILLANCE GUIDELINES

Saro Aprikian, Charles Ménard, C Hansen-Barkun, A N Barkun, J Beauchesne-Blanchet, M Martel, K Shanahan, N Milky, D Von Renteln
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background United States MultiSociety TaskForce (USMSTF) guidelines addressing post-polypectomy colonoscopy intervals were issued in 2012 and modified in 2020. Aims Assess post-polypectomy surveillance intervals adherence to USMSTF 2012 and 2020 recommendations. Methods We included patients with a past personal or index colonoscopy history of colon polyps from two tertiary hospitals. Procedural reports were reviewed and patients stratified according to index colonoscopy findings into: normal colonoscopy, 1–2 small (<10 mm) adenomas, 3–4 small adenomas, 5–10 polyps, >10 polyps, ≥1 adenoma ≥10 mm, at least one adenoma with high grade dysplasia, or a serrated polyp with dysplasia, or a traditional serrated adenoma. Recommended follow-up intervals were classified as earlier, later or adherent to 2020 guidelines, and compared to 2012 recommendations. Results Overall, 5,204 colonoscopies were included over 47 months. When the first follow-up index colonoscopy was normal (n = 963), adherence to follow-up was only 7.9% as per both guidelines, i.e.: 86.7% scheduled sooner than recommended (<10 years). For patients with 1–2 adenomas (<10 mm) (n = 2,388), adherence was 71.4% according to 2012 guidelines (5 years) but fell to 3.3% with 2020 recommendations (7-10 years); most patients were still assigned a 5-year follow-up (87.1%). For 3–4 small adenomas (<10 mm) (n = 505), adherence was 47.6% for 2020 guidelines (3-5 years). When >10 polyps were removed (n = 22), there was better compliance, with adherence rates of 86.4% according to 2012 guidelines (< 3 years) and 50.0% for the 2020 recommendations (1 year). For lesions requiring a 3-year surveillance interval common to both guideline era, adherence was 39.5% for polyps ≥10 mm, 22.9% for villous/tubulovillous histology with/without high grade dysplasia, 27.1% for adenoma with high grade dysplasia, 12.5% for sessile serrated polyps with dysplasia, and 15.4% for traditional serrated adenomas. All non-adherent recommendations suggested a colonoscopy sooner than the recommended intervals, except for those with villous/tubulovillous histology with or without dysplasia, among whom 55.7% were later than the recommended post-polypectomy colonoscopy intervals. Conclusions Continued practice according to earlier-surveillance interval persist, particularly for low-risk patients with a normal colonoscopy or 1–2 small adenomas, despite the revises 7–10 year extended interval recommendations in 2020. Adherence for high-risk findings was moderate and unchanged, while delayed follow-up was most frequent among patients with villous or tubulovillous adenomas. There is a need for improved implementation of societal recommendations to ensure optimal evidence-based surveillance practices in the face of what are often limited colonoscopy resources. Funding Agencies The study as been funded by the CPAC

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
Université de Sherbrooke (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Poster Session I – Poster of Distinction - A96 ADHERENCE TO PAST AND CONTEMPORARY POST-POLYPECTOMY SURVEILLANCE GUIDELINES — Saro Aprikian, Charles Ménard, et al. · Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS