Poster Session I - A113 PRACTICES AND PERCEPTIONS OF ADVANCED ENDOSCOPIC IMAGING TECHNIQUES FOR COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA DETECTION IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD): A SURVEY AMONG CANADIAN IBD SPECIALISTS

Abstract Background Dye chromoendoscopy (DCE) and virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) are recommended as first-line adjuncts in conjunction with high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) for colorectal neoplasm (CRN) detection in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Aims This study surveyed Canadian IBD specialists to understand their perceptions, preferences, and practices regarding image-enhancement modalities (including DCE, VCE, and Artificial Intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy) for CRN detection in IBD, to inform future studies and clinical recommendations. Methods Developed collaboratively by IBD experts and methodologists, the survey assessed physicians’ attitudes toward colonoscopy image-enhancement modalities for CRN surveillance in IBD, evaluating five domains: current practices, familiarity with advanced techniques, perceptions of AI-assisted endoscopy, barriers to adoption, and research priorities. It was distributed to IBD specialists affiliated with the Canadian IBD Research Consortium and conducted per CROSS guidelines. Results Of 82 specialists invited, 33 responded (40.2%). Most worked in academic centers (90%); 39.4% managed large IBD practices. VCE was the most used advanced imaging modality (84.8%), followed by DCE (33.3%), HD-WLE plus non-targeted biopsies (33.3%), AI-assisted colonoscopy (18.2%), and HD-WLE alone (6.1%). Although 60.6% considered DCE and VCE similarly effective, drawbacks included need for meticulous bowel preparation (VCE 26.6%, DCE 24.1%) and poor visualization on a background of active inflammation (VCE 26.6%, DCE 12%). AI-assisted colonoscopy was seen as promising for CRN detection; 78.8% agreed randomized controlled trials are needed, and 39.4% would adopt AI if it improved CRN detection by 5% over HD-WLE. Conclusions This survey highlights a shift towards VCE over DCE, perceived drawbacks of chromoendoscopy, limited availability and uncertainty regarding AI-assisted colonoscopy, and a desire for future research to demonstrate AI’s utility for CRN detection in IBD. Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.113
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session I - A113 PRACTICES AND PERCEPTIONS OF ADVANCED ENDOSCOPIC IMAGING TECHNIQUES FOR COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA DETECTION IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD): A SURVEY AMONG CANADIAN IBD SPECIALISTS

Talat Bessissow, Tim Ramsay, Frank Hoentjen, P Greenstreet et al.
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Poster Session I - A113 PRACTICES AND PERCEPTIONS OF ADVANCED ENDOSCOPIC IMAGING TECHNIQUES FOR COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA DETECTION IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD): A SURVEY AMONG CANADIAN IBD SPECIALISTS

Talat Bessissow, Tim Ramsay, Frank Hoentjen, P Greenstreet, L M van Lierop, S Murthy, R Dang, N Narula
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Dye chromoendoscopy (DCE) and virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) are recommended as first-line adjuncts in conjunction with high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) for colorectal neoplasm (CRN) detection in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Aims This study surveyed Canadian IBD specialists to understand their perceptions, preferences, and practices regarding image-enhancement modalities (including DCE, VCE, and Artificial Intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy) for CRN detection in IBD, to inform future studies and clinical recommendations. Methods Developed collaboratively by IBD experts and methodologists, the survey assessed physicians’ attitudes toward colonoscopy image-enhancement modalities for CRN surveillance in IBD, evaluating five domains: current practices, familiarity with advanced techniques, perceptions of AI-assisted endoscopy, barriers to adoption, and research priorities. It was distributed to IBD specialists affiliated with the Canadian IBD Research Consortium and conducted per CROSS guidelines. Results Of 82 specialists invited, 33 responded (40.2%). Most worked in academic centers (90%); 39.4% managed large IBD practices. VCE was the most used advanced imaging modality (84.8%), followed by DCE (33.3%), HD-WLE plus non-targeted biopsies (33.3%), AI-assisted colonoscopy (18.2%), and HD-WLE alone (6.1%). Although 60.6% considered DCE and VCE similarly effective, drawbacks included need for meticulous bowel preparation (VCE 26.6%, DCE 24.1%) and poor visualization on a background of active inflammation (VCE 26.6%, DCE 12%). AI-assisted colonoscopy was seen as promising for CRN detection; 78.8% agreed randomized controlled trials are needed, and 39.4% would adopt AI if it improved CRN detection by 5% over HD-WLE. Conclusions This survey highlights a shift towards VCE over DCE, perceived drawbacks of chromoendoscopy, limited availability and uncertainty regarding AI-assisted colonoscopy, and a desire for future research to demonstrate AI’s utility for CRN detection in IBD. Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
University of Ottawa (CA), University of Alberta (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), McGill University (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.