Insured Operated-System Markets: Noisy Proof-of-Operation, Basis Risk, and Adoption Complementarities for Agentic Work

Working Paper v0.2.3. This paper is part of the Agentic Governance Series. Core idea: Agentic AI shifts production from individual labor to operated systems—a human principal orchestrating agents and tools under an operating protocol. The central economic friction is cross-organizational verifiability of protocol execution under confidentiality constraints. We model Proof-of-Operation (PoO) as portable, episode-level operational evidence that generates a noisy compliance signal with an ROC frontier. The same evidence object is reused across procurement contracts and insurance, coupling their information structures. In a principal–agent model, PoO creates an incentive wedge but also a false-positive burden that raises compensation and can screen out high-reliability suppliers. We microfound evidence-conditioned insurance as a response to insurers' desire to cover fortuitous failures while excluding protocol-avoidable failures. Noisy evidence induces basis risk, rationalizing limited coverage even under competition. With fixed underwriting setup costs, underwriting frictions fall with market scale and evidence quality, generating adoption complementarities and potentially multiple equilibria (low-trust insurer retreat vs high-trust insured micro-contracting). Companion paper (Architecture): DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18666683.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18628214
Primary Topic
Auction Theory and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insured Operated-System Markets: Noisy Proof-of-Operation, Basis Risk, and Adoption Complementarities for Agentic Work

Rei Kumaki
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Auction Theory and Applications
article

Insured Operated-System Markets: Noisy Proof-of-Operation, Basis Risk, and Adoption Complementarities for Agentic Work

Rei Kumaki
article en

Abstract

Working Paper v0.2.3. This paper is part of the Agentic Governance Series. Core idea: Agentic AI shifts production from individual labor to operated systems—a human principal orchestrating agents and tools under an operating protocol. The central economic friction is cross-organizational verifiability of protocol execution under confidentiality constraints. We model Proof-of-Operation (PoO) as portable, episode-level operational evidence that generates a noisy compliance signal with an ROC frontier. The same evidence object is reused across procurement contracts and insurance, coupling their information structures. In a principal–agent model, PoO creates an incentive wedge but also a false-positive burden that raises compensation and can screen out high-reliability suppliers. We microfound evidence-conditioned insurance as a response to insurers' desire to cover fortuitous failures while excluding protocol-avoidable failures. Noisy evidence induces basis risk, rationalizing limited coverage even under competition. With fixed underwriting setup costs, underwriting frictions fall with market scale and evidence quality, generating adoption complementarities and potentially multiple equilibria (low-trust insurer retreat vs high-trust insured micro-contracting). Companion paper (Architecture): DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18666683.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Auction Theory and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.