Assessing Proxy-Based Grassland Gross Primary Productivity Using Machine Learning Approaches and Multi-Source Remote Sensing

Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) in grassland ecosystems is a fundamental eco-biophysical indicator for assessing carbon cycling, grazing capacity, and ecosystem responses to climatic stress. However, robust estimation of GPP in arid and semi-arid rangelands remains challenging because of pronounced spatial heterogeneity, strong climate variability, and inherent uncertainties associated with remotely sensed observations. Together, these factors constrain both modeling performance and out-of-sample generalization beyond the training domain. In this dryland grassland context, this study compares the performance of machine learning (ML) models for grassland GPP proxy-based characterization, downscaling, and predictive agreement using a multivariate dataset that integrates Sentinel-2-derived spectral and phenological features, a Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-derived GPP proxy, and complementary climatic and geographic information. Pixel-level observations spanning multiple years are analyzed, with ordinary linear regression used as a baseline benchmark and ensemble decision-tree models, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Histogram-based Gradient Boosting (HGB), compared. Instead of relying solely on random cross-validation, model performance is systematically assessed using a combination of spatially structured validation and a leave-one-year-out scheme to explicitly examine spatial and temporal generalization. The results indicate that ensemble tree-based models outperform linear approaches, with the HGB model showing the strongest agreement with the MODIS-derived GPP proxy (R2 = 0.95, RMSE = 0.035 on the test set) and maintaining stable performance across spatial and temporal validations (R2 = 0.86–0.96 across years). Taken together, the findings demonstrate that integrating multi-source remote sensing data with climatic information within a rigorous validation framework enables a more reliable assessment of model generalization and gap-filling consistency with respect to a remote-sensing-based proxy target, rather than an absolute validation against ground-based measurements, thereby supporting sustainability-relevant monitoring of arid grassland ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18041944
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Proxy-Based Grassland Gross Primary Productivity Using Machine Learning Approaches and Multi-Source Remote Sensing

Tsolmon Sodnomdavaa
Sustainability
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Assessing Proxy-Based Grassland Gross Primary Productivity Using Machine Learning Approaches and Multi-Source Remote Sensing

Tsolmon Sodnomdavaa
article en

Abstract

Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) in grassland ecosystems is a fundamental eco-biophysical indicator for assessing carbon cycling, grazing capacity, and ecosystem responses to climatic stress. However, robust estimation of GPP in arid and semi-arid rangelands remains challenging because of pronounced spatial heterogeneity, strong climate variability, and inherent uncertainties associated with remotely sensed observations. Together, these factors constrain both modeling performance and out-of-sample generalization beyond the training domain. In this dryland grassland context, this study compares the performance of machine learning (ML) models for grassland GPP proxy-based characterization, downscaling, and predictive agreement using a multivariate dataset that integrates Sentinel-2-derived spectral and phenological features, a Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-derived GPP proxy, and complementary climatic and geographic information. Pixel-level observations spanning multiple years are analyzed, with ordinary linear regression used as a baseline benchmark and ensemble decision-tree models, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Histogram-based Gradient Boosting (HGB), compared. Instead of relying solely on random cross-validation, model performance is systematically assessed using a combination of spatially structured validation and a leave-one-year-out scheme to explicitly examine spatial and temporal generalization. The results indicate that ensemble tree-based models outperform linear approaches, with the HGB model showing the strongest agreement with the MODIS-derived GPP proxy (R2 = 0.95, RMSE = 0.035 on the test set) and maintaining stable performance across spatial and temporal validations (R2 = 0.86–0.96 across years). Taken together, the findings demonstrate that integrating multi-source remote sensing data with climatic information within a rigorous validation framework enables a more reliable assessment of model generalization and gap-filling consistency with respect to a remote-sensing-based proxy target, rather than an absolute validation against ground-based measurements, thereby supporting sustainability-relevant monitoring of arid grassland ecosystems.

SustainabilityVol. 18(4)
University of Finance and Economics (MN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.