Impact of Taper Design on Cleaning Efficacy, Stress Generation, and Irrigant Performance: A Combined Experimental, Finite Element Analysis, and Computational Fluid Dynamics Assessment

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to compare the cleaning efficacy, biomechanical stress distribution under simulated occlusal loading after instrumentation, and irrigant dynamics of three NiTi rotary systems, namely ProTaper Gold, TruNatomy, and SlimShaper, using a combined experimental, finite element analysis (FEA), and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach. <b>Methods:</b> Transparent 3D replicas of mandibular mesial roots filled with a gel-like pulp tissue were instrumented with the three systems (<i>n</i> = 13 per group). Standardized irrigation was performed with 4% NaOCl delivered through IrriFlex<sup>®</sup> needles positioned 2 mm from the working length. Cleaning effectiveness was assessed through digital image analysis, FEA simulation of occlusal loading, and CFD evaluation of irrigation flow, wall shear stress, and dynamic pressure. <b>Results:</b> All systems left residual tissue, with no statistically significant differences in cleaning efficacy among them (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Descriptively, ProTaper Gold showed the lowest mean residual tissue (0.15 ± 0.25%), followed by SlimShaper (2.50 ± 3.81%) and TruNatomy (4.20 ± 5.12%). CFD revealed that ProTaper Gold generated the highest irrigant velocities and wall shear stresses, while SlimShaper showed the highest dynamic pressure. FEA indicated that ProTaper Gold produced the highest stress concentrations, especially in the pericervical dentin, whereas TruNatomy and SlimShaper preserved more dentin. <b>Conclusions:</b> Cleaning efficacy was comparable across systems. CFD/FEA from representative models illustrated patterns of irrigant dynamics and dentin preservation without supporting system superiority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14020108
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Taper Design on Cleaning Efficacy, Stress Generation, and Irrigant Performance: A Combined Experimental, Finite Element Analysis, and Computational Fluid Dynamics Assessment

Giulia Malvicini, Ana Ramírez-Muñoz, César de Gregorio, Simone Grandini et al.
Dentistry Journal
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Impact of Taper Design on Cleaning Efficacy, Stress Generation, and Irrigant Performance: A Combined Experimental, Finite Element Analysis, and Computational Fluid Dynamics Assessment

Giulia Malvicini, Ana Ramírez-Muñoz, César de Gregorio, Simone Grandini, Ana Martín-Díaz, Alejandro R. Pérez, José Aranguren, Celia Vinuesa Maqueda, Gaya C. S. Vieira, Natalia Navarrete
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> This study aimed to compare the cleaning efficacy, biomechanical stress distribution under simulated occlusal loading after instrumentation, and irrigant dynamics of three NiTi rotary systems, namely ProTaper Gold, TruNatomy, and SlimShaper, using a combined experimental, finite element analysis (FEA), and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach. <b>Methods:</b> Transparent 3D replicas of mandibular mesial roots filled with a gel-like pulp tissue were instrumented with the three systems (<i>n</i> = 13 per group). Standardized irrigation was performed with 4% NaOCl delivered through IrriFlex<sup>®</sup> needles positioned 2 mm from the working length. Cleaning effectiveness was assessed through digital image analysis, FEA simulation of occlusal loading, and CFD evaluation of irrigation flow, wall shear stress, and dynamic pressure. <b>Results:</b> All systems left residual tissue, with no statistically significant differences in cleaning efficacy among them (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Descriptively, ProTaper Gold showed the lowest mean residual tissue (0.15 ± 0.25%), followed by SlimShaper (2.50 ± 3.81%) and TruNatomy (4.20 ± 5.12%). CFD revealed that ProTaper Gold generated the highest irrigant velocities and wall shear stresses, while SlimShaper showed the highest dynamic pressure. FEA indicated that ProTaper Gold produced the highest stress concentrations, especially in the pericervical dentin, whereas TruNatomy and SlimShaper preserved more dentin. <b>Conclusions:</b> Cleaning efficacy was comparable across systems. CFD/FEA from representative models illustrated patterns of irrigant dynamics and dentin preservation without supporting system superiority.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(2)
University of Siena (IT), Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), Universidad Europea de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.