The Semiotics and Politics of Perspective

ABSTRACT: In addition to providing an overview of the papers of this special issue, this introduction theorizes perspective as a semiotic, and thus political, phenomenon for sociocultural and linguistic anthropological study. As we argue, despite the term being closely linked to visualist and spatialist conceptions (if “extended” in capacious ways to diverse phenomena), perspective is best thought of as equally at play in all types of semiosis; as such, we ask how different modalities and media, from visual images in film to oral speech and written literature to face-to-face interaction and architecture, are underwritten by a common semiotics of perspective. Following Peirce and his uptake in linguistic anthropology, we distinguish and articulate perspective as an intrinsic function of the sign relation (as interpretant), as an emergent discourse-level precipitate (as entextualized), and as the result of inter-discursive processes of conventionalization and institutionalization (as enregistered). In doing so, we stress the capacity of perspective to itself become an object of reflexive focus, and thus of political action and authority (contestation, naturalization, reform).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anthropological Quarterly
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2025.a983089
Primary Topic
Semiotics and Representation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Semiotics and Politics of Perspective

Constantine V. Nakassis, James T. Costa
Anthropological Quarterly
Semiotics and Representation Studies
article

The Semiotics and Politics of Perspective

Constantine V. Nakassis, James T. Costa
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In addition to providing an overview of the papers of this special issue, this introduction theorizes perspective as a semiotic, and thus political, phenomenon for sociocultural and linguistic anthropological study. As we argue, despite the term being closely linked to visualist and spatialist conceptions (if “extended” in capacious ways to diverse phenomena), perspective is best thought of as equally at play in all types of semiosis; as such, we ask how different modalities and media, from visual images in film to oral speech and written literature to face-to-face interaction and architecture, are underwritten by a common semiotics of perspective. Following Peirce and his uptake in linguistic anthropology, we distinguish and articulate perspective as an intrinsic function of the sign relation (as interpretant), as an emergent discourse-level precipitate (as entextualized), and as the result of inter-discursive processes of conventionalization and institutionalization (as enregistered). In doing so, we stress the capacity of perspective to itself become an object of reflexive focus, and thus of political action and authority (contestation, naturalization, reform).

Anthropological QuarterlyVol. 98(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Semiotics and Representation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.