When a ‘click’ becomes a question: Unteaching photography

This article examines the current state of photography education in Australia amid neo-liberal restructuring, government disinvestment and the emergence of generative AI. It reflects on what is at stake when photography loses its disciplinary purchase, as well as the educator’s contradictory position working within systems that actively dismantle space for critical reflection. Prompted by the closure of a university photography programme and the wider decline of institutional support for photography as a discipline, this article examines the political and institutional factors that have made photographic practice and education increasingly uncertain. Drawing on the work of bell hooks and Ariella Azoulay, this article raises questions about what is lost when photography is instrumentalized for market outcomes and what it might mean to teach photography otherwise, if teaching it at all remains possible. It reflects on ‘unteaching photography’ as a potential way forward, using the camera’s ‘click’ as a contested gesture. It asks, most urgently, if photography education offers a space to think creatively and critically about images and their entanglements with power, what occurs when that space disappears?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Photography
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/pop_00115_1
Primary Topic
Photography and Visual Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When a ‘click’ becomes a question: Unteaching photography

Cherine Fahd
Philosophy of Photography
Photography and Visual Culture
article

When a ‘click’ becomes a question: Unteaching photography

Cherine Fahd
article en

Abstract

This article examines the current state of photography education in Australia amid neo-liberal restructuring, government disinvestment and the emergence of generative AI. It reflects on what is at stake when photography loses its disciplinary purchase, as well as the educator’s contradictory position working within systems that actively dismantle space for critical reflection. Prompted by the closure of a university photography programme and the wider decline of institutional support for photography as a discipline, this article examines the political and institutional factors that have made photographic practice and education increasingly uncertain. Drawing on the work of bell hooks and Ariella Azoulay, this article raises questions about what is lost when photography is instrumentalized for market outcomes and what it might mean to teach photography otherwise, if teaching it at all remains possible. It reflects on ‘unteaching photography’ as a potential way forward, using the camera’s ‘click’ as a contested gesture. It asks, most urgently, if photography education offers a space to think creatively and critically about images and their entanglements with power, what occurs when that space disappears?

Philosophy of PhotographyVol. 16(2)
University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Photography and Visual Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When a ‘click’ becomes a question: Unteaching photography — Cherine Fahd · Philosophy of Photography (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS