Canopy Rainfall Storage Capacity Quantified Across the Diversely Vegetated Sites of the United States National Ecological Observatory Network

ABSTRACT This study investigates canopy storage capacity ( S )—the maximum amount of rainfall stored in a forest canopy—using field data from 648 storm events across 15 diversely vegetated sites of the United States National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON). We compared these S values to remotely sensed and ground‐based vegetation metrics of leaf area index (LAI), mean canopy height, and biomass density. We found that S values were generally constrained within a narrow range (site‐level medians averaged 0.9 mm and ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 mm) relative to larger ranges in biomass, height, and LAI. Vegetation height partially explained this variation; other tested vegetation‐structure variables did not significantly explain S . Significant seasonal variations in S were also observed in a subset of sites. Within sites, S often varied with vegetation traits, but those relationships were inconsistent across sites. We also found that specific storage capacity ( S spec ; mm of S per unit LAI, as inferred from ground‐based LAI measurements), with site‐level median values averaging 0.6 and ranging from 0.3 to 1.7, was not effectively explained by variations in vegetation structure. The limited ability for vegetation metrics to explain S or S spec may be due to challenges in a single vegetation metric capturing the diverse traits that explain canopy storage, or due to scale mismatches in throughfall measurements relative to available vegetation‐structure data. Regardless of reason, our findings contrast with common assumptions and modelling conventions and do not suggest that using vegetation‐structure metrics to scale S is more appropriate than assuming S to be constant across forested sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrological Processes
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70435
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Canopy Rainfall Storage Capacity Quantified Across the Diversely Vegetated Sites of the United States National Ecological Observatory Network

Stephen P. Good, Scott T. Allen, Gabriel Barinas, Abigail G. Sandquist
Hydrological Processes
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Canopy Rainfall Storage Capacity Quantified Across the Diversely Vegetated Sites of the United States National Ecological Observatory Network

Stephen P. Good, Scott T. Allen, Gabriel Barinas, Abigail G. Sandquist
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates canopy storage capacity ( S )—the maximum amount of rainfall stored in a forest canopy—using field data from 648 storm events across 15 diversely vegetated sites of the United States National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON). We compared these S values to remotely sensed and ground‐based vegetation metrics of leaf area index (LAI), mean canopy height, and biomass density. We found that S values were generally constrained within a narrow range (site‐level medians averaged 0.9 mm and ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 mm) relative to larger ranges in biomass, height, and LAI. Vegetation height partially explained this variation; other tested vegetation‐structure variables did not significantly explain S . Significant seasonal variations in S were also observed in a subset of sites. Within sites, S often varied with vegetation traits, but those relationships were inconsistent across sites. We also found that specific storage capacity ( S spec ; mm of S per unit LAI, as inferred from ground‐based LAI measurements), with site‐level median values averaging 0.6 and ranging from 0.3 to 1.7, was not effectively explained by variations in vegetation structure. The limited ability for vegetation metrics to explain S or S spec may be due to challenges in a single vegetation metric capturing the diverse traits that explain canopy storage, or due to scale mismatches in throughfall measurements relative to available vegetation‐structure data. Regardless of reason, our findings contrast with common assumptions and modelling conventions and do not suggest that using vegetation‐structure metrics to scale S is more appropriate than assuming S to be constant across forested sites.

Hydrological ProcessesVol. 40(2)
Oregon State University (US), University of Nevada, Reno (US), Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nevada Space Grant Consortium
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.