Negotiating science, power, and identity: The institutionalization of Ayurveda in contemporary India

Ayurveda, an ancient medical system of India, has evolved through various historical and cultural contexts, starting from Royal patronage, colonial dominance and to patronage of secular state. While science is often perceived as objective and free of social influence, it is, in reality shaped by social forces. This paper explores the institutionalization of Ayurveda, focusing on its transformation into a recognized science of medicine across different phases. Using a systematic review of the literature and semi-structured interviews with Ayurvedic practitioners, student-interns, and state bureaucrats, the study investigates the role of key social agencies – namely the state, religion, and market-in Ayurveda's growth and transformation. It examines the state's influence in Ayurveda's integration into the public health system, its regulation, and its recognition as a legitimate medical system. Additionally, the paper analyses the negotiation between Ayurveda's traditional roots and its modernization, addressing the secularization of the practice within a democratic framework. The study is grounded in the Sociology of Scientific knowledge (SSK) and Foucauldian theories of power/knowledge and governmentality to analyze the dynamics of knowledge, authority, and regulation in Ayurveda's development. It critically examines the complex relationship between state patronage, secularism, and democracy, and how these intersect to shape the legitimacy of Ayurveda in contemporary India. This paper highlights how political power, cultural context, and economic factors influence the construction and perception of Ayurvedic knowledge. • Medicine functions as a form of political power that shapes the legitimacy, authority, and survival of medical knowledge systems. • Drawing on interviews with practitioners, student-interns, and bureaucrats, the study offers an empirical account of Ayurveda's contemporary institutionalization. • State patronage across ancient, colonial, and post-independence periods has profoundly restructured Ayurveda's education, research, and practice. • Shifting regimes, ideologies, and ecological conditions have transformed Ayurvedic knowledge production and therapeutic practices. • Contemporary state interventions seek to reposition Ayurveda as a secular and scientific medical system within global health frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-02-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102535
Primary Topic
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating science, power, and identity: The institutionalization of Ayurveda in contemporary India

S. Anuja Priya
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
article

Negotiating science, power, and identity: The institutionalization of Ayurveda in contemporary India

S. Anuja Priya
article en

Abstract

Ayurveda, an ancient medical system of India, has evolved through various historical and cultural contexts, starting from Royal patronage, colonial dominance and to patronage of secular state. While science is often perceived as objective and free of social influence, it is, in reality shaped by social forces. This paper explores the institutionalization of Ayurveda, focusing on its transformation into a recognized science of medicine across different phases. Using a systematic review of the literature and semi-structured interviews with Ayurvedic practitioners, student-interns, and state bureaucrats, the study investigates the role of key social agencies – namely the state, religion, and market-in Ayurveda's growth and transformation. It examines the state's influence in Ayurveda's integration into the public health system, its regulation, and its recognition as a legitimate medical system. Additionally, the paper analyses the negotiation between Ayurveda's traditional roots and its modernization, addressing the secularization of the practice within a democratic framework. The study is grounded in the Sociology of Scientific knowledge (SSK) and Foucauldian theories of power/knowledge and governmentality to analyze the dynamics of knowledge, authority, and regulation in Ayurveda's development. It critically examines the complex relationship between state patronage, secularism, and democracy, and how these intersect to shape the legitimacy of Ayurveda in contemporary India. This paper highlights how political power, cultural context, and economic factors influence the construction and perception of Ayurvedic knowledge. • Medicine functions as a form of political power that shapes the legitimacy, authority, and survival of medical knowledge systems. • Drawing on interviews with practitioners, student-interns, and bureaucrats, the study offers an empirical account of Ayurveda's contemporary institutionalization. • State patronage across ancient, colonial, and post-independence periods has profoundly restructured Ayurveda's education, research, and practice. • Shifting regimes, ideologies, and ecological conditions have transformed Ayurvedic knowledge production and therapeutic practices. • Contemporary state interventions seek to reposition Ayurveda as a secular and scientific medical system within global health frameworks.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
University of Hyderabad (IN), Fondazione Stella Maris (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.