Are the public ready to bear the costs of phasing out coal-fired power plants? An economic feasibility analysis

The phasing-out of coal-fired power generation is a critical policy imperative in the energy system transition towards climate change mitigation. This research examines whether the public is willing to share the costs that will arise from the phasing-out of coal-fired power generation. To this end, this study analyzes the public's willingness to pay for policies aimed at reducing coal-fired power generation and assesses their economic feasibility. Stated preference data from 1000 Korean households nationwide are analyzed using the contingent valuation method and cost-benefit analysis (CBA). The results indicate that households are willing to pay an average of KRW 4514 (USD 3.45) with a 95% confidence interval of [KRW 4,087, KRW 5017] per month in additional electricity fees for the next five years to implement compensation and support measures for the phasing-out of coal-fired power plants. The results of the CBA, including sensitivity analysis, suggest that the implementation of support and compensation policies for coal power phasing-out may not be economically feasible. The Korean public is not yet fully prepared to bear the costs associated with the phase-out of coal-fired power generation, and either increased electricity tariffs or excessive government investment for this process could provoke considerable controversy. • Public willingness to pay for coal phase-out policies is analyzed. • Contingent valuation method reveals WTP is KRW 4514/month (USD 3.45). • Benefit-cost ratio of 0.43 suggests low economic feasibility. • Korean households may not be ready to fully bear coal phase-out costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Policy
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2026.115177
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are the public ready to bear the costs of phasing out coal-fired power plants? An economic feasibility analysis

Hye-Jeong Lee, Sung-Yoon Huh, Seung-Hoon Yoo
Energy Policy
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Are the public ready to bear the costs of phasing out coal-fired power plants? An economic feasibility analysis

Hye-Jeong Lee, Sung-Yoon Huh, Seung-Hoon Yoo
article en

Abstract

The phasing-out of coal-fired power generation is a critical policy imperative in the energy system transition towards climate change mitigation. This research examines whether the public is willing to share the costs that will arise from the phasing-out of coal-fired power generation. To this end, this study analyzes the public's willingness to pay for policies aimed at reducing coal-fired power generation and assesses their economic feasibility. Stated preference data from 1000 Korean households nationwide are analyzed using the contingent valuation method and cost-benefit analysis (CBA). The results indicate that households are willing to pay an average of KRW 4514 (USD 3.45) with a 95% confidence interval of [KRW 4,087, KRW 5017] per month in additional electricity fees for the next five years to implement compensation and support measures for the phasing-out of coal-fired power plants. The results of the CBA, including sensitivity analysis, suggest that the implementation of support and compensation policies for coal power phasing-out may not be economically feasible. The Korean public is not yet fully prepared to bear the costs associated with the phase-out of coal-fired power generation, and either increased electricity tariffs or excessive government investment for this process could provoke considerable controversy. • Public willingness to pay for coal phase-out policies is analyzed. • Contingent valuation method reveals WTP is KRW 4514/month (USD 3.45). • Benefit-cost ratio of 0.43 suggests low economic feasibility. • Korean households may not be ready to fully bear coal phase-out costs.

Energy PolicyVol. 212
Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.