Comparative performance assessment of ecological restoration techniques for transmission line slopes: integrating geotechnical stability and ecological indicators

Ecological restoration of transmission line slopes is essential for infrastructure sustainability in mountainous regions, yet comparative assessments of restoration techniques are lacking. This study evaluated four restoration approaches—vegetation concrete (VC), hydroseeding (HS), ecological bags (EB), and natural restoration (NR)—over 24 months on a slope in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Geotechnical indicators (shear strength, root tensile strength) and ecological indicators (vegetation coverage, Shannon diversity index, aboveground biomass, soil organic matter) were monitored throughout the experimental period. The VC treatment demonstrated superior performance, achieving the highest shear strength (45.8 kPa), root tensile strength (12.8 MPa), and vegetation coverage (82.3%), with a comprehensive evaluation score of 99.8, followed by EB (84.8), HS (72.8), and NR (42.5). Strong positive correlations were identified between ecological and geotechnical indicators (r = 0.963 for biomass–root tensile strength; r = 0.890 for coverage–shear strength), whereas a moderate correlation between Shannon diversity and geotechnical metrics (r = 0.496) suggested a trade-off between species diversity and structural stability. These findings provide quantitative guidance for selecting restoration techniques in transmission line corridor management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2026.1732033
Primary Topic
Tree Root and Stability Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative performance assessment of ecological restoration techniques for transmission line slopes: integrating geotechnical stability and ecological indicators

Qi Zhang, Xue Jiang, Wei-Mao Xu, Ou Zhang et al.
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Tree Root and Stability Studies
article

Comparative performance assessment of ecological restoration techniques for transmission line slopes: integrating geotechnical stability and ecological indicators

Qi Zhang, Xue Jiang, Wei-Mao Xu, Ou Zhang, Ya-Fang Zhao
article en

Abstract

Ecological restoration of transmission line slopes is essential for infrastructure sustainability in mountainous regions, yet comparative assessments of restoration techniques are lacking. This study evaluated four restoration approaches—vegetation concrete (VC), hydroseeding (HS), ecological bags (EB), and natural restoration (NR)—over 24 months on a slope in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Geotechnical indicators (shear strength, root tensile strength) and ecological indicators (vegetation coverage, Shannon diversity index, aboveground biomass, soil organic matter) were monitored throughout the experimental period. The VC treatment demonstrated superior performance, achieving the highest shear strength (45.8 kPa), root tensile strength (12.8 MPa), and vegetation coverage (82.3%), with a comprehensive evaluation score of 99.8, followed by EB (84.8), HS (72.8), and NR (42.5). Strong positive correlations were identified between ecological and geotechnical indicators (r = 0.963 for biomass–root tensile strength; r = 0.890 for coverage–shear strength), whereas a moderate correlation between Shannon diversity and geotechnical metrics (r = 0.496) suggested a trade-off between species diversity and structural stability. These findings provide quantitative guidance for selecting restoration techniques in transmission line corridor management.

Frontiers in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 14
Economic Research Institute (BG), Economic Research Institute (KZ)
Economic Research Institute
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Tree Root and Stability Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.