Over‐the‐Counter Provision of Oral Contraceptive Pills for Patients With Dysmenorrhea, Suspected or Confirmed Endometriosis or Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Evidence Gaps

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the effectiveness, values and preferences, and cost associated with over‐the‐counter oral contraceptive pills for self‐managing dysmenorrhea, including symptoms related to suspected or confirmed endometriosis or chronic pelvic pain. Methods Comprehensive searches of peer‐reviewed and grey literature were conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and EMBASE) from inception through to April 2025 and screened using predefined eligibility criteria. Results No eligible studies were identified. We found no evidence evaluating the effectiveness, values and preferences, or cost of over‐the‐counter oral contraceptive pills compared to standard of care for managing dysmenorrhea. Conclusion The absence of evidence highlights an important research gap in the use of self‐management strategies for dysmenorrhea. Future studies could evaluate comparative outcomes, implementation models, and preferences of women affected by dysmenorrhea, including in low‐ and middle‐income settings and among underserved communities. A phased approach, such as pharmacist‐led over‐the‐counter access, could address current access barriers while providing critical data to guide future policy decisions. PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42024616792.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reproductive Female and Child Health
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rfc2.70040
Primary Topic
Menstrual Health and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Over‐the‐Counter Provision of Oral Contraceptive Pills for Patients With Dysmenorrhea, Suspected or Confirmed Endometriosis or Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Evidence Gaps

Jennifer Rasanathan, Ping Teresa Yeh, Amarachi Ijeoma, Caitlin E. Kennedy et al.
Reproductive Female and Child Health
Menstrual Health and Disorders
article

Over‐the‐Counter Provision of Oral Contraceptive Pills for Patients With Dysmenorrhea, Suspected or Confirmed Endometriosis or Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Evidence Gaps

Jennifer Rasanathan, Ping Teresa Yeh, Amarachi Ijeoma, Caitlin E. Kennedy, Manjulaa Narasimhan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the effectiveness, values and preferences, and cost associated with over‐the‐counter oral contraceptive pills for self‐managing dysmenorrhea, including symptoms related to suspected or confirmed endometriosis or chronic pelvic pain. Methods Comprehensive searches of peer‐reviewed and grey literature were conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and EMBASE) from inception through to April 2025 and screened using predefined eligibility criteria. Results No eligible studies were identified. We found no evidence evaluating the effectiveness, values and preferences, or cost of over‐the‐counter oral contraceptive pills compared to standard of care for managing dysmenorrhea. Conclusion The absence of evidence highlights an important research gap in the use of self‐management strategies for dysmenorrhea. Future studies could evaluate comparative outcomes, implementation models, and preferences of women affected by dysmenorrhea, including in low‐ and middle‐income settings and among underserved communities. A phased approach, such as pharmacist‐led over‐the‐counter access, could address current access barriers while providing critical data to guide future policy decisions. PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42024616792.

Reproductive Female and Child HealthVol. 5(1)
United Nations Development Programme (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), World Health Organization (CH)
UNICEF, Johns Hopkins University, Children's Investment Fund Foundation, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Menstrual Health and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.