Drying kinetics, power consumption, economic and environmental analysis of pomegranate peels drying using a hybrid solar dryer compared with oven dryer

Drying pomegranate peels, a by-product of juice production, preserves their beneficial properties and minimizes waste. Using optimal drying conditions, such as controlled temperatures and thin layers, improves efficiency and ensures high quality. These dried peels can then be utilized in various industries, including food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. To our knowledge, there are no existing studies that detail the effects of hybrid solar drying, drying temperatures, and layer thickness on the drying kinetics, power consumption, and economic and environmental aspects. In this study, a hybrid indirect SD (HISD) with a temperature and humidity control unit was used to dry pomegranate peels at three different temperatures-50 °C, 60 °C, and 70 °C-and three different thicknesses-1, 2, and 3 cm. The HISD was then compared to a conventional oven drying system (CODS). The obtained results indicated that increasing the drying temperature increased the weight loss of pomegranate peels. Also, the average initial moisture content of pomegranate peels was 76.5% (w.b.). The final MC ranged from 2.67 to 2.10% and from 2.97 to 2.84% for the CODS and HISD, respectively. The higher drying rates of the pomegranate peels dried using CODS and HISD were 169.79 and 196 kg<sub>water/kgdrymatter</sub>/h, respectively, at a layer thickness of 3 cm and a drying temperature of 70 °C. Additionally, using HISD led to a reduction in power consumption by about 64.28% to 75.75% compared to the CODS. Furthermore, the environmental analysis results showed that the embodied energy is about 1270.463 kW.h. The energy payback period for HISD ranges between 2.38 and 6.34 years. The earned carbon credit for drying pomegranate peels using the HISD ranged between 770.1 and 2207.2 USD. Based on economic analysis, the lowest drying cost using the HISD was 144.5 USD per ton of pomegranate peels, achieved at layer thicknesses of 1 cm and a drying temperature of 70 °C.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22464-7
Primary Topic
Food Drying and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drying kinetics, power consumption, economic and environmental analysis of pomegranate peels drying using a hybrid solar dryer compared with oven dryer

Abdallah Elshawadfy Elwakeel, El-Sayed Khater, Khaled Abdeen Mousa Ali, Ali Salem et al.
Scientific Reports
Food Drying and Modeling
article

Drying kinetics, power consumption, economic and environmental analysis of pomegranate peels drying using a hybrid solar dryer compared with oven dryer

Abdallah Elshawadfy Elwakeel, El-Sayed Khater, Khaled Abdeen Mousa Ali, Ali Salem, Adel Bahnasawy, Khaled A. Metwally, Ahmed Elbeltagi, Abdelaziz M. Okasha, Aml Abubakr Tantawy, Samy A. Marey
article en

Abstract

Drying pomegranate peels, a by-product of juice production, preserves their beneficial properties and minimizes waste. Using optimal drying conditions, such as controlled temperatures and thin layers, improves efficiency and ensures high quality. These dried peels can then be utilized in various industries, including food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics. To our knowledge, there are no existing studies that detail the effects of hybrid solar drying, drying temperatures, and layer thickness on the drying kinetics, power consumption, and economic and environmental aspects. In this study, a hybrid indirect SD (HISD) with a temperature and humidity control unit was used to dry pomegranate peels at three different temperatures-50 °C, 60 °C, and 70 °C-and three different thicknesses-1, 2, and 3 cm. The HISD was then compared to a conventional oven drying system (CODS). The obtained results indicated that increasing the drying temperature increased the weight loss of pomegranate peels. Also, the average initial moisture content of pomegranate peels was 76.5% (w.b.). The final MC ranged from 2.67 to 2.10% and from 2.97 to 2.84% for the CODS and HISD, respectively. The higher drying rates of the pomegranate peels dried using CODS and HISD were 169.79 and 196 kg<sub>water/kgdrymatter</sub>/h, respectively, at a layer thickness of 3 cm and a drying temperature of 70 °C. Additionally, using HISD led to a reduction in power consumption by about 64.28% to 75.75% compared to the CODS. Furthermore, the environmental analysis results showed that the embodied energy is about 1270.463 kW.h. The energy payback period for HISD ranges between 2.38 and 6.34 years. The earned carbon credit for drying pomegranate peels using the HISD ranged between 770.1 and 2207.2 USD. Based on economic analysis, the lowest drying cost using the HISD was 144.5 USD per ton of pomegranate peels, achieved at layer thicknesses of 1 cm and a drying temperature of 70 °C.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
South China Agricultural University (CN), Beni-Suef University (EG), Kafrelsheikh University (EG), Mansoura University (EG), Zagazig University (EG), Benha University (EG), King Saud University (SA), University of Pecs (HU), Aswan University (EG), Minia University (EG)
King Saud University, Pécsi Tudományegyetem
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Food Drying and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.