Do Adolescent Hearing Aid Users Prefer Digital Noise Reduction to Be Activated? Findings From the Laboratory and Home Environments

The results of the current study demonstrate robust subjective benefits of advanced digital noise activation in the laboratory, with no effects on speech intelligibility. In addition, participants were internally consistent in the laboratory; their self-adjusted settings were consistent with the program they preferred during the double-blind, paired comparisons testing. However, the findings with the smartphone application demonstrate that, in general, they did not activate the advanced digital noise reduction during their self-identified difficult listening situations in the field. This result could partially be explained by the limited reported use of the smartphone application during the field trial. Future study is warranted to reconcile the laboratory and field trial findings in this study. In the interim, a reasonable clinical approach with limited negative speech intelligibility consequences might be to activate advanced digital noise reduction by default and provide smartphone application access in case a patient discovers a preference for an alternative noise reduction strength.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ear and Hearing
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001794
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Adolescent Hearing Aid Users Prefer Digital Noise Reduction to Be Activated? Findings From the Laboratory and Home Environments

Erin M. Picou, Kayleigh Pletch, Kjersten Branscome, Andrea Dunn et al.
Ear and Hearing
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Do Adolescent Hearing Aid Users Prefer Digital Noise Reduction to Be Activated? Findings From the Laboratory and Home Environments

Erin M. Picou, Kayleigh Pletch, Kjersten Branscome, Andrea Dunn, Johanna Nelson, Lisa Standaert
article en

Abstract

The results of the current study demonstrate robust subjective benefits of advanced digital noise activation in the laboratory, with no effects on speech intelligibility. In addition, participants were internally consistent in the laboratory; their self-adjusted settings were consistent with the program they preferred during the double-blind, paired comparisons testing. However, the findings with the smartphone application demonstrate that, in general, they did not activate the advanced digital noise reduction during their self-identified difficult listening situations in the field. This result could partially be explained by the limited reported use of the smartphone application during the field trial. Future study is warranted to reconcile the laboratory and field trial findings in this study. In the interim, a reasonable clinical approach with limited negative speech intelligibility consequences might be to activate advanced digital noise reduction by default and provide smartphone application access in case a patient discovers a preference for an alternative noise reduction strength.

Ear and Hearing
Sonova (Switzerland) (CH), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Adolescent Hearing Aid Users Prefer Digital Noise Reduction to Be Activated? Findings From the Laboratory and Home Environments — Erin M. Picou, Kayleigh Pletch, et al. · Ear and Hearing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS