Revisiting model-independent constraints on spatial curvature and cosmic ladders calibration: updated and forecast analyses

ABSTRACT In recent years, model-independent approaches have gained increasing attention as powerful tools to investigate persistent tensions between cosmological observations and the predictions of the standard Lambda cold dark matter model. Notably, recent data from the DESY5 Type Ia supernovae (SNIa) sample and the latest baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from the DESI collaboration challenge the validity of the cosmological constant, and under the assumption of standard pre-recombination physics, they still remain in tension with the SH0ES local distance ladder measurements. Building on our previous work, we present a follow-up analysis of the model-independent calibration of both the local and inverse distance ladders using cosmic chronometers (CCH) data and the Gaussian Processes technique. We constrain the SNIa absolute magnitude, M, and the comoving sound horizon at the baryon-drag epoch, $r_d$, while simultaneously deriving a measurement of the spatial curvature parameter, $\Omega _k$, using CCH with DESY5 and DESI DR1 and DR2 data releases. Our results show that this data combination is compatible with a flat Universe at $\sim 1.7\sigma$, with $\Omega _k = -0.143 \pm 0.085$, indicating a weaker compatibility than that observed with SNIa from Pantheon+, while the ladders calibrators read $M=-19.324_{-0.095}^{+0.092}$ and $r_d = (144.00^{+5.38}_{-4.88}$) Mpc. Although current uncertainties limit the precision of our constraints and prevent us from arbitrating the Hubble tension, it is nevertheless instructive to explore the constraining power of our methodology with future SNIa, CCH, and BAO observations from surveys such as Vera C. Rubin Observatory – LSST, Euclid, and DESI. Thus, for the first time, we present a forecast analysis for the triad $(M, \Omega _k, r_d)$. Our results indicate that, in an optimistic scenario, upcoming data will improve agnostic constraints on the ladder calibrators, M by $\sim$54 per cent, $r_d$ by $\sim$66 per cent, which enable us to constrain the Hubble parameter, $H_0$, at a 2 per cent level. Precision on $\Omega _k$ will increase by $\sim 50~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$. Our analysis outlines which improvements in future data – whether in quality, quantity, or redshift coverage – are likely to have the greatest impact on tightening these constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag303
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting model-independent constraints on spatial curvature and cosmic ladders calibration: updated and forecast analyses

Arianna Favale, Marina Migliaccio, Adrià Gómez-Valent
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
article

Revisiting model-independent constraints on spatial curvature and cosmic ladders calibration: updated and forecast analyses

Arianna Favale, Marina Migliaccio, Adrià Gómez-Valent
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent years, model-independent approaches have gained increasing attention as powerful tools to investigate persistent tensions between cosmological observations and the predictions of the standard Lambda cold dark matter model. Notably, recent data from the DESY5 Type Ia supernovae (SNIa) sample and the latest baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from the DESI collaboration challenge the validity of the cosmological constant, and under the assumption of standard pre-recombination physics, they still remain in tension with the SH0ES local distance ladder measurements. Building on our previous work, we present a follow-up analysis of the model-independent calibration of both the local and inverse distance ladders using cosmic chronometers (CCH) data and the Gaussian Processes technique. We constrain the SNIa absolute magnitude, M, and the comoving sound horizon at the baryon-drag epoch, $r_d$, while simultaneously deriving a measurement of the spatial curvature parameter, $\Omega _k$, using CCH with DESY5 and DESI DR1 and DR2 data releases. Our results show that this data combination is compatible with a flat Universe at $\sim 1.7\sigma$, with $\Omega _k = -0.143 \pm 0.085$, indicating a weaker compatibility than that observed with SNIa from Pantheon+, while the ladders calibrators read $M=-19.324_{-0.095}^{+0.092}$ and $r_d = (144.00^{+5.38}_{-4.88}$) Mpc. Although current uncertainties limit the precision of our constraints and prevent us from arbitrating the Hubble tension, it is nevertheless instructive to explore the constraining power of our methodology with future SNIa, CCH, and BAO observations from surveys such as Vera C. Rubin Observatory – LSST, Euclid, and DESI. Thus, for the first time, we present a forecast analysis for the triad $(M, \Omega _k, r_d)$. Our results indicate that, in an optimistic scenario, upcoming data will improve agnostic constraints on the ladder calibrators, M by $\sim$54 per cent, $r_d$ by $\sim$66 per cent, which enable us to constrain the Hubble parameter, $H_0$, at a 2 per cent level. Precision on $\Omega _k$ will increase by $\sim 50~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$. Our analysis outlines which improvements in future data – whether in quality, quantity, or redshift coverage – are likely to have the greatest impact on tightening these constraints.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 546(4)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Institut Català de Ciències del Clima (ES), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma I (IT), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
European Commission, Universitat de Barcelona, Fundación Bancaria Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.