Distinguishing between the COVID-19 pandemic and influenza pandemics (A/H1N1, A/H2N2, A/H3N2): a narrative review

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic is frequently compared to historical influenza outbreaks, yet this analogy often obscures fundamental biological and epidemiological divergences. As the global health community confronts new threats like H5N1 avian influenza, a rigorous retrospective analysis is essential to distinguish the unique trajectory of SARS-CoV-2 from the influenza pandemics of 1957 (H2N2), 1968 (H3N2), and 2009 (H1N1). This narrative review, adhering to best-practice guidance, synthesises literature published up to mid-2025. We performed targeted searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and WHO/CDC archives to compare SARS-CoV-2 critically and Influenza A across virological, clinical, and sociopolitical dimensions. Our analysis reveals that while both pathogens share respiratory transmission, they differ starkly in evolutionary mechanisms and systemic impact. Virologically, SARS-CoV-2 utilises convergent evolution and broad ACE2 tropism to cause multi-organ pathology and long-term sequelae (Long COVID), distinguishing it from the primarily respiratory effects and reassortment-driven shifts of influenza. Epidemiologically, SARS-CoV-2 exhibits a significantly higher basic reproduction number (R 0 ), rising from ~ 2.5 to > 9.5 in Omicron variants, and substantial asymptomatic transmission, necessitating non-pharmaceutical interventions of unprecedented scale compared to the modest measures of past flu pandemics. The public health response also highlighted a divergence in medical innovation: the development of mRNA vaccines within 11 months represented a “quantum leap” in vaccinology compared to the slower, egg-based timelines of 2009. In conclusion, COVID-19 represents a distinct biological and societal entity that defies the historical “flu template.” The transition to endemicity, marked by year-round waves of immune-evasive variants like JN.1, and the current emergence of mammalian H5N1 underscore the need for pathogen-agnostic preparedness. Future global health security depends on leveraging the genomic and technological assets developed during COVID-19 to counter threats that transcend historical expectations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-026-01409-8
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing between the COVID-19 pandemic and influenza pandemics (A/H1N1, A/H2N2, A/H3N2): a narrative review

O. O. Yusuf, Lanre Peter Daodu, Methodius Okouzi
Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center
Influenza Virus Research Studies
article

Distinguishing between the COVID-19 pandemic and influenza pandemics (A/H1N1, A/H2N2, A/H3N2): a narrative review

O. O. Yusuf, Lanre Peter Daodu, Methodius Okouzi
article en

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic is frequently compared to historical influenza outbreaks, yet this analogy often obscures fundamental biological and epidemiological divergences. As the global health community confronts new threats like H5N1 avian influenza, a rigorous retrospective analysis is essential to distinguish the unique trajectory of SARS-CoV-2 from the influenza pandemics of 1957 (H2N2), 1968 (H3N2), and 2009 (H1N1). This narrative review, adhering to best-practice guidance, synthesises literature published up to mid-2025. We performed targeted searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and WHO/CDC archives to compare SARS-CoV-2 critically and Influenza A across virological, clinical, and sociopolitical dimensions. Our analysis reveals that while both pathogens share respiratory transmission, they differ starkly in evolutionary mechanisms and systemic impact. Virologically, SARS-CoV-2 utilises convergent evolution and broad ACE2 tropism to cause multi-organ pathology and long-term sequelae (Long COVID), distinguishing it from the primarily respiratory effects and reassortment-driven shifts of influenza. Epidemiologically, SARS-CoV-2 exhibits a significantly higher basic reproduction number (R 0 ), rising from ~ 2.5 to > 9.5 in Omicron variants, and substantial asymptomatic transmission, necessitating non-pharmaceutical interventions of unprecedented scale compared to the modest measures of past flu pandemics. The public health response also highlighted a divergence in medical innovation: the development of mRNA vaccines within 11 months represented a “quantum leap” in vaccinology compared to the slower, egg-based timelines of 2009. In conclusion, COVID-19 represents a distinct biological and societal entity that defies the historical “flu template.” The transition to endemicity, marked by year-round waves of immune-evasive variants like JN.1, and the current emergence of mammalian H5N1 underscore the need for pathogen-agnostic preparedness. Future global health security depends on leveraging the genomic and technological assets developed during COVID-19 to counter threats that transcend historical expectations.

Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research CenterVol. 50(1)
Kingston University London (GB), Obafemi Awolowo University (NG), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.