Local Cloud-Based Collaborative Learning vs Other IIoT Decentralized AI Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract The increasing complexity and dynamic nature of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) demand scalable, adaptive, intuitive, and real-time automation frameworks. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of edge- and cloud-based collaborative learning frameworks for predictive maintenance and smart manufacturing tasks. In this SLR, we highlight the under-utilization of distributed computational architectures that provide complete automation support (design and run-time), flexibility, scalability, and inter- & intra-cloud service exchange while adhering to security management and integrity principles for solving IIoT tasks using modern artificial intelligence (AI) models at the edge/cloud. Recently, many IIoT applications have been designed using AI models that require robust, low-latency, and data-secure frameworks. This demand drives a trend toward distributed computational architectures in which data storage and processing are partially or fully decentralized. Common paradigms addressing this resource distribution include edge computing, federated learning, and private or hybrid clouds. We analyze 50 recent studies against IoT characteristics, AI performance metrics, and network/system management requirements. Our findings reveal underutilization of distributed architectures that support automation, interoperability, and security. While most solutions rely on centralized or hybrid clouds, fewer than 5% adopt federated or transfer learning, and over 60% remain dependent on supervised models. We also introduce a comparative perspective on network and security management, showing that local/private cloud implementations can reduce control-plane overhead and synchronization latency, though gaps persist in dynamic bandwidth allocation and zero-trust adoption. Finally, we benchmark our previously proposed local cloud-based collaborative learning (CCL) model against state-of-the-art solutions, highlighting its strengths in automation and interoperability, as well as limitations in adaptive computation and intelligent offloading. This review identifies the research gaps and opportunities for integrating collaborative AI, secure automation, and hybrid architectures to meet Industry 5.0 objectives of resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Network and Systems Management
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-025-10029-y
Primary Topic
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local Cloud-Based Collaborative Learning vs Other IIoT Decentralized AI Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review

Salman Javed, Hamam Mokayed, Jerker Delsing, Saleha Haseeb et al.
Journal of Network and Systems Management
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
article

Local Cloud-Based Collaborative Learning vs Other IIoT Decentralized AI Solutions: A Systematic Literature Review

Salman Javed, Hamam Mokayed, Jerker Delsing, Saleha Haseeb, Sergio Martin-del-Campo, Marcus Liwicki, Fredrik Sandin
article en

Abstract

Abstract The increasing complexity and dynamic nature of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) demand scalable, adaptive, intuitive, and real-time automation frameworks. This paper presents a systematic literature review (SLR) of edge- and cloud-based collaborative learning frameworks for predictive maintenance and smart manufacturing tasks. In this SLR, we highlight the under-utilization of distributed computational architectures that provide complete automation support (design and run-time), flexibility, scalability, and inter- & intra-cloud service exchange while adhering to security management and integrity principles for solving IIoT tasks using modern artificial intelligence (AI) models at the edge/cloud. Recently, many IIoT applications have been designed using AI models that require robust, low-latency, and data-secure frameworks. This demand drives a trend toward distributed computational architectures in which data storage and processing are partially or fully decentralized. Common paradigms addressing this resource distribution include edge computing, federated learning, and private or hybrid clouds. We analyze 50 recent studies against IoT characteristics, AI performance metrics, and network/system management requirements. Our findings reveal underutilization of distributed architectures that support automation, interoperability, and security. While most solutions rely on centralized or hybrid clouds, fewer than 5% adopt federated or transfer learning, and over 60% remain dependent on supervised models. We also introduce a comparative perspective on network and security management, showing that local/private cloud implementations can reduce control-plane overhead and synchronization latency, though gaps persist in dynamic bandwidth allocation and zero-trust adoption. Finally, we benchmark our previously proposed local cloud-based collaborative learning (CCL) model against state-of-the-art solutions, highlighting its strengths in automation and interoperability, as well as limitations in adaptive computation and intelligent offloading. This review identifies the research gaps and opportunities for integrating collaborative AI, secure automation, and hybrid architectures to meet Industry 5.0 objectives of resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity.

Journal of Network and Systems ManagementVol. 34(2)
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
European Commission, Electronic Components and Systems for European Leadership
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.