Taking citizens’ ideas and discourse seriously: a non-elite take on discursive institutionalism

Abstract The amplification of citizen voice in democratic processes poses new challenges for policymakers and highlights the need of academic work to refocus attention on ordinary citizens in political discourse, including in notoriously elite-driven policy areas. We propose a non-elite take on Discursive Institutionalism and apply its baseline ambition to take “ideas and discourse seriously” systematically to the context of EU foreign-policy decision-making in two fundamentally different institutional contexts: the Republic of Cyprus as a simple polity and the Republic of Ireland as a tendentially compound one. We show that unlike what empirical applications to date suggest, the approach not only lends itself to such a bottom-up application; our research design maximises its original analytical ambitions by revealing how institutional design shapes citizen influence and thereby answers to a normative imperative that neither academics nor political leaders can afford to ignore.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative European Politics
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-025-00447-2
Primary Topic
Cyprus History, Politics, Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taking citizens’ ideas and discourse seriously: a non-elite take on discursive institutionalism

Andrea Christou, Carmen Gebhard
Comparative European Politics
Cyprus History, Politics, Society
article

Taking citizens’ ideas and discourse seriously: a non-elite take on discursive institutionalism

Andrea Christou, Carmen Gebhard
article en

Abstract

Abstract The amplification of citizen voice in democratic processes poses new challenges for policymakers and highlights the need of academic work to refocus attention on ordinary citizens in political discourse, including in notoriously elite-driven policy areas. We propose a non-elite take on Discursive Institutionalism and apply its baseline ambition to take “ideas and discourse seriously” systematically to the context of EU foreign-policy decision-making in two fundamentally different institutional contexts: the Republic of Cyprus as a simple polity and the Republic of Ireland as a tendentially compound one. We show that unlike what empirical applications to date suggest, the approach not only lends itself to such a bottom-up application; our research design maximises its original analytical ambitions by revealing how institutional design shapes citizen influence and thereby answers to a normative imperative that neither academics nor political leaders can afford to ignore.

Comparative European PoliticsVol. 24(1)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cyprus History, Politics, Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Taking citizens’ ideas and discourse seriously: a non-elite take on discursive institutionalism — Andrea Christou, Carmen Gebhard · Comparative European Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS