Poster Session II A332 AGE AND SEX INFLUENCE ESOPHAGEAL SYMPTOMS IN REFLUX-NEGATIVE PATIENTS WITH NORMAL ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY

Abstract Background Functional esophageal symptoms such as heartburn and dysphagia are common, often occurring in the absence of demonstrable reflux or major motility disorders. Pathophysiology is multifactorial, involving visceral hypersensitivity, altered central processing, and impaired esophageal perception. The relationship between demographic factors and symptom burden in patients with normal motility and no reflux remains unclear. The Esophageal Symptom Questionnaire (ESQ-30) is a validated tool measuring frequency and severity of dysphagia (ESQ-D), reflux (ESQ-R), and globus (ESQ-G). Aims To determine the effect of age and sex on esophageal symptoms in reflux-negative patients with normal esophageal motility. Methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutive high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies between July 2022–October 2024. Inclusion required normal esophageal motility (no esophageal motility disorder by Chicago Classification v4.0) and complete ESQ-30 data. Patients with evidence of GERD by Lyon 2.0 criteria (LA grade B-D esophagitis/Barrett’s esophagus, off-therapy AET >6%, on-therapy AET >4%) were excluded. ESQ subscales were summarized as median (IQR). Group comparisons used Mann-Whitney U tests. Correlations between ESQ subscales, manometric variables (IRP, DCI, % failed, % weak, % incomplete bolus clearance), and age were assessed with Spearman’s bivariate correlations. Results Within the study period, 184 patients (median age 52 [40–62] years, 122 [63.1%] female) met inclusion criteria with normal motility, complete ESQ-30 questionnaires and no evidence of GERD. Median ESQ-D, ESQ-R, and ESQ-G scores were 4 [0–17], 23 [7–41.75], and 16 [4-36], respectively. Females reported higher symptom scores than males: ESQ-D (7.5 vs 1.5, p = .004), ESQ-R (28.0 vs 15.5, p = .012), and ESQ-G (19.5 vs 9, p = .007). Males demonstrated lower mean DCI (p = .024 and 1918.3 vs 2442.2 mmHg●cm●s, p = .029). Increasing age correlated negatively with reflux symptoms (ESQ-R ρ = .178, p = .016) and mean DCI (ρ = .156, p = .035). No other significant associations between age, manometric parameters, or symptoms were observed. Conclusions Symptom profiles in reflux-negative patients with normal esophageal motility vary by age and sex. Women reported greater symptom burden across dysphagia, reflux, and globus domains, while older patients reported fewer reflux symptoms. These findings suggest demographic factors influence symptom perception independent of motility or reflux. Subgroup analyses (e.g., functional heartburn vs functional dysphagia) may clarify pathophysiologic differences and guide individualized management strategies. Funding Agencies None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.331
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session II A332 AGE AND SEX INFLUENCE ESOPHAGEAL SYMPTOMS IN REFLUX-NEGATIVE PATIENTS WITH NORMAL ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY

Michelle Buresi, Krystyna Pokraka, M Gupta, M Woo et al.
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Poster Session II A332 AGE AND SEX INFLUENCE ESOPHAGEAL SYMPTOMS IN REFLUX-NEGATIVE PATIENTS WITH NORMAL ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY

Michelle Buresi, Krystyna Pokraka, M Gupta, M Woo, C N Andrews, R Kharfan, D Y Li, Y Nasser
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Functional esophageal symptoms such as heartburn and dysphagia are common, often occurring in the absence of demonstrable reflux or major motility disorders. Pathophysiology is multifactorial, involving visceral hypersensitivity, altered central processing, and impaired esophageal perception. The relationship between demographic factors and symptom burden in patients with normal motility and no reflux remains unclear. The Esophageal Symptom Questionnaire (ESQ-30) is a validated tool measuring frequency and severity of dysphagia (ESQ-D), reflux (ESQ-R), and globus (ESQ-G). Aims To determine the effect of age and sex on esophageal symptoms in reflux-negative patients with normal esophageal motility. Methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutive high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies between July 2022–October 2024. Inclusion required normal esophageal motility (no esophageal motility disorder by Chicago Classification v4.0) and complete ESQ-30 data. Patients with evidence of GERD by Lyon 2.0 criteria (LA grade B-D esophagitis/Barrett’s esophagus, off-therapy AET >6%, on-therapy AET >4%) were excluded. ESQ subscales were summarized as median (IQR). Group comparisons used Mann-Whitney U tests. Correlations between ESQ subscales, manometric variables (IRP, DCI, % failed, % weak, % incomplete bolus clearance), and age were assessed with Spearman’s bivariate correlations. Results Within the study period, 184 patients (median age 52 [40–62] years, 122 [63.1%] female) met inclusion criteria with normal motility, complete ESQ-30 questionnaires and no evidence of GERD. Median ESQ-D, ESQ-R, and ESQ-G scores were 4 [0–17], 23 [7–41.75], and 16 [4-36], respectively. Females reported higher symptom scores than males: ESQ-D (7.5 vs 1.5, p = .004), ESQ-R (28.0 vs 15.5, p = .012), and ESQ-G (19.5 vs 9, p = .007). Males demonstrated lower mean DCI (p = .024 and 1918.3 vs 2442.2 mmHg●cm●s, p = .029). Increasing age correlated negatively with reflux symptoms (ESQ-R ρ = .178, p = .016) and mean DCI (ρ = .156, p = .035). No other significant associations between age, manometric parameters, or symptoms were observed. Conclusions Symptom profiles in reflux-negative patients with normal esophageal motility vary by age and sex. Women reported greater symptom burden across dysphagia, reflux, and globus domains, while older patients reported fewer reflux symptoms. These findings suggest demographic factors influence symptom perception independent of motility or reflux. Subgroup analyses (e.g., functional heartburn vs functional dysphagia) may clarify pathophysiologic differences and guide individualized management strategies. Funding Agencies None

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.