Need for harmonized terminology in cryopreservation to support reproducibility, regulation, and translation
As cryopreservation technologies continue to develop, the need for harmonized terminology across the multitude of disciplines where cryopreservation is applied is becoming increasingly acute. Terminology in cryopreservation remains inconsistent, leading to confusion and barriers to progress. Applications of cryopreservation in medicine, food, agriculture, and conservation remain limited by this lack of consensus. Inconsistent terminology contributes to ethical, legal, and societal issues in translating and integrating new cryopreservation technologies. Here we identify the problem with examples of cryopreservation terminology that demand harmonization. We describe the need for terminological consistency by providing examples of effective terminology harmonization projects in related fields. We propose next steps, highlighting the important role that professional societies should play to reach consensus on terminology among cryopreservation stakeholders and the broader cryobiology community.
Authors
- Matthew J. Powell‐Palm (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5117-8296)
- Timothy L. Pruett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0715-8535)
- Joseph Sushil Rao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0197-6107)
- John C. Bischof (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6726-7111)
- Lakshya Gangwar
- Joseph Kangas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3672-1849)
- Nikolas Zuchowicz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3577-0190)
- Korkut Uygun
- Srivasupradha Ramesh
- Lowell Wolfe
- Susan M. Wolf
- Bat-Erdene Namsrai
- Irina Filz von Reiterdank
Institutions
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Minnesota System (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- University of Minnesota Medical Center (US)
- Center for Systems Biology (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cryobiology
- Published
- 2026-02-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2026.105584
- Primary Topic
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00