Diagnostic value of routine fluoroscopy after sleeve gastrectomy: Accuracy, cost, and clinical implications

Staple-line leakage remains one of the most serious complications of sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Although routine postoperative fluoroscopy is commonly performed to detect leaks, its true diagnostic and clinical value remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, and cost implications of routine fluoroscopy compared to selective symptom-driven imaging after SG. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Mersin City Training and Research Hospital and included 301 patients who underwent primary SG between January 2019 and December 2024. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who underwent routine postoperative fluoroscopy (Group I, n = 268) and those managed with selective imaging based on clinical findings (Group II, n = 33). Computed tomography was used as the reference standard to confirm the leaks. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v25. Diagnostic indices, including sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, were calculated, and cost differences were analyzed. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. The leak rate was 0.7% in Group I and 3.0% in Group II (P = .751). Fluoroscopy demonstrated low sensitivity (37.5%), but high specificity (96.2%), and negative predictive value (98.3%), with a moderate receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.67. Despite similar clinical outcomes, the fluoroscopy group incurred higher costs ($4100 ± 650 vs $3500 ± 540, P < .05). Our findings indicate that routine postoperative fluoroscopy after sleeve gastrectomy contributes minimally to diagnostic or clinical decision-making. While its specificity and negative predictive accuracy remain excellent, its limited sensitivity and additional cost reduce its overall value. Adopting a selective, symptom-oriented imaging strategy, supported by clinical evaluation and computed tomography, appears to be safer and more cost-effective. Future multicenter studies that combine clinical evaluation, imaging, and biomarkers may further improve early leak detection and help standardize postoperative care in bariatric surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000047644
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic value of routine fluoroscopy after sleeve gastrectomy: Accuracy, cost, and clinical implications

Sinan Aslan, Haci Vural Soyer
Medicine
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Diagnostic value of routine fluoroscopy after sleeve gastrectomy: Accuracy, cost, and clinical implications

Sinan Aslan, Haci Vural Soyer
article en

Abstract

Staple-line leakage remains one of the most serious complications of sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Although routine postoperative fluoroscopy is commonly performed to detect leaks, its true diagnostic and clinical value remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, and cost implications of routine fluoroscopy compared to selective symptom-driven imaging after SG. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Mersin City Training and Research Hospital and included 301 patients who underwent primary SG between January 2019 and December 2024. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who underwent routine postoperative fluoroscopy (Group I, n = 268) and those managed with selective imaging based on clinical findings (Group II, n = 33). Computed tomography was used as the reference standard to confirm the leaks. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v25. Diagnostic indices, including sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, were calculated, and cost differences were analyzed. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. The leak rate was 0.7% in Group I and 3.0% in Group II (P = .751). Fluoroscopy demonstrated low sensitivity (37.5%), but high specificity (96.2%), and negative predictive value (98.3%), with a moderate receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.67. Despite similar clinical outcomes, the fluoroscopy group incurred higher costs ($4100 ± 650 vs $3500 ± 540, P < .05). Our findings indicate that routine postoperative fluoroscopy after sleeve gastrectomy contributes minimally to diagnostic or clinical decision-making. While its specificity and negative predictive accuracy remain excellent, its limited sensitivity and additional cost reduce its overall value. Adopting a selective, symptom-oriented imaging strategy, supported by clinical evaluation and computed tomography, appears to be safer and more cost-effective. Future multicenter studies that combine clinical evaluation, imaging, and biomarkers may further improve early leak detection and help standardize postoperative care in bariatric surgery.

MedicineVol. 105(7)
Mersin Üniversitesi (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.