Poster Session I - A117 IMPACT OF PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN GENDER ON PHYSICIAN ASSESSMENT OF IBD REFERRALS

Abstract Background Physicans’ implicit gender biases impact clinical practice and may be amplified if patients have co-existent mental health conditions. Gender biases in gastroenterology referrals have not been characterized, which could lead to disparities in triage and endoscopy. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience diagnostic delays, likely due to abdominal symptoms that may initially appear indistinguishable from irritable bowel syndrome. Therefore, we sought to assess how patient and physician gender, as well as mental health history, influence how physicians rate the likelihood of IBD in a patient referred with ambiguous gastrointestinal symptoms. Aims To evaluate whether IBD likelihood scores differ between patient gender, mental health history, and physician gender. Methods We conducted a between subjects randomized survey of North American gastroenterology physicians and fellows to review a hypothetical patient with features equivocal for Crohn’s Disease. Each participant was randomized to review male or female case vignettes which were otherwise identical, with or without a history of mental health comorbidities. Participants were located through gastroenterology organizations and snowball recruitment. Demographics and perceived likelihood of IBD (continuous scale 1-100) were collected. Descriptive statistics were used for demographics, and continuous variables used Welch’s t-test and two-way ANOVA for interaction effects, with p<0.05 considered as statistically significant. Results Ninety-five physicians completed the survey (56% practicing, 44% in-training; 55% male, 44% female, 1% non-conforming). Male vignettes were perceived to have a significantly higher likelihood of IBD than females (mean difference= -7.8, p= 0.047). No differences were observed with mental health comorbidity (mean difference = +4.2, p= 0.29). Two-way ANOVA confirmed a main effect of patient sex (F(1,91)=4.11, p= 0.046), but not for mental health (p= 0.35) nor an interaction between these factors (p= 0.34). Incorporating physician gender in a secondary ANOVA, there were no significant effects (Table 1). Conclusions This is the first study to directly survey gastroenterologists to explore whether patient or physician gender impacts clinician triage and perception of IBD likelihood, with significantly higher ratings in male than equivocal female vignettes. Future work should examine contributing factors to gender-related diagnostic bias and decision-making in clinical practice. Funding Agencies Mount Sinai Hospital Resident Research Grant

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf042.117
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poster Session I - A117 IMPACT OF PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN GENDER ON PHYSICIAN ASSESSMENT OF IBD REFERRALS

L Targownik, G Wang, J H Chow
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Poster Session I - A117 IMPACT OF PATIENT AND PHYSICIAN GENDER ON PHYSICIAN ASSESSMENT OF IBD REFERRALS

L Targownik, G Wang, J H Chow
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Physicans’ implicit gender biases impact clinical practice and may be amplified if patients have co-existent mental health conditions. Gender biases in gastroenterology referrals have not been characterized, which could lead to disparities in triage and endoscopy. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience diagnostic delays, likely due to abdominal symptoms that may initially appear indistinguishable from irritable bowel syndrome. Therefore, we sought to assess how patient and physician gender, as well as mental health history, influence how physicians rate the likelihood of IBD in a patient referred with ambiguous gastrointestinal symptoms. Aims To evaluate whether IBD likelihood scores differ between patient gender, mental health history, and physician gender. Methods We conducted a between subjects randomized survey of North American gastroenterology physicians and fellows to review a hypothetical patient with features equivocal for Crohn’s Disease. Each participant was randomized to review male or female case vignettes which were otherwise identical, with or without a history of mental health comorbidities. Participants were located through gastroenterology organizations and snowball recruitment. Demographics and perceived likelihood of IBD (continuous scale 1-100) were collected. Descriptive statistics were used for demographics, and continuous variables used Welch’s t-test and two-way ANOVA for interaction effects, with p<0.05 considered as statistically significant. Results Ninety-five physicians completed the survey (56% practicing, 44% in-training; 55% male, 44% female, 1% non-conforming). Male vignettes were perceived to have a significantly higher likelihood of IBD than females (mean difference= -7.8, p= 0.047). No differences were observed with mental health comorbidity (mean difference = +4.2, p= 0.29). Two-way ANOVA confirmed a main effect of patient sex (F(1,91)=4.11, p= 0.046), but not for mental health (p= 0.35) nor an interaction between these factors (p= 0.34). Incorporating physician gender in a secondary ANOVA, there were no significant effects (Table 1). Conclusions This is the first study to directly survey gastroenterologists to explore whether patient or physician gender impacts clinician triage and perception of IBD likelihood, with significantly higher ratings in male than equivocal female vignettes. Future work should examine contributing factors to gender-related diagnostic bias and decision-making in clinical practice. Funding Agencies Mount Sinai Hospital Resident Research Grant

Journal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
University of Ottawa (CA), University of Toronto (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.