Cardiovascular and Thromboembolic Risk of Janus Kinase Inhibitors Compared to Other Disease-Modifying Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are an effective treatment option for rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, emerging concerns regarding cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk have prompted further investigation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients receiving JAKi versus other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). <b>Methods:</b> Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and a preregistered protocol, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting MACE or VTE among adults with RA treated with JAKi or comparator DMARDs were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) from observational studies and odds ratios (ORs) from RCTs were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models depending on heterogeneity. A sensitivity analysis was conducted for participants aged ≥ 65 years. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-five observational studies and eight RCTs were included. Across observational studies, the pooled HRs for MACE showed no significant difference between JAKi and other DMARDs, HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.85-1.13. This finding remained consistent in individuals aged ≥ 65 years. No increase in MACE risk was observed across RCTs, OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.89-1.81. In contrast, JAKi use was associated with a significantly higher risk of VTE in the observational studies (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.08-1.61) but not in the RCTs (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 0.94-3.02). <b>Conclusions:</b> JAKi use does not appear to increase the risk of MACE compared to DMARDs, including in older adults, but may be associated with a higher risk of VTE. These findings highlight the importance of a personalized approach when considering JAKi therapy, incorporating structured cardiovascular and thrombotic risk assessment, patient preferences, and mitigation of modifiable risk factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16020113
Primary Topic
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiovascular and Thromboembolic Risk of Janus Kinase Inhibitors Compared to Other Disease-Modifying Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

E. Ntatsaki, Efthymia Maria Kapasouri, Vassilios S. Vassiliou, Diomidis Ioannidis
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
article

Cardiovascular and Thromboembolic Risk of Janus Kinase Inhibitors Compared to Other Disease-Modifying Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

E. Ntatsaki, Efthymia Maria Kapasouri, Vassilios S. Vassiliou, Diomidis Ioannidis
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are an effective treatment option for rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, emerging concerns regarding cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk have prompted further investigation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients receiving JAKi versus other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). <b>Methods:</b> Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and a preregistered protocol, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting MACE or VTE among adults with RA treated with JAKi or comparator DMARDs were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) from observational studies and odds ratios (ORs) from RCTs were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models depending on heterogeneity. A sensitivity analysis was conducted for participants aged ≥ 65 years. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-five observational studies and eight RCTs were included. Across observational studies, the pooled HRs for MACE showed no significant difference between JAKi and other DMARDs, HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.85-1.13. This finding remained consistent in individuals aged ≥ 65 years. No increase in MACE risk was observed across RCTs, OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.89-1.81. In contrast, JAKi use was associated with a significantly higher risk of VTE in the observational studies (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.08-1.61) but not in the RCTs (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 0.94-3.02). <b>Conclusions:</b> JAKi use does not appear to increase the risk of MACE compared to DMARDs, including in older adults, but may be associated with a higher risk of VTE. These findings highlight the importance of a personalized approach when considering JAKi therapy, incorporating structured cardiovascular and thrombotic risk assessment, patient preferences, and mitigation of modifiable risk factors.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 16(2)
University of East Anglia (GB), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB), East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Ipswich Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.