Tacticisation of Strategy: A Comprehensive Review

Strategy has been expressed in many different ways, such as a course of action that integrates ends, ways and means to meet policy objectives. However, strategy can be replaced by tactics and some scholars have labelled this phenomenon ‘tacticisation of strategy’. In the context of this review, ‘strategy’ means a specific plan concerning the direction and use made of means, by chosen ways, to achieve desired ends. Its function is to cope with a particular historical context in time and space. On the other hand, ‘tactics’ refers to actual military behaviour or how strategy is executed. This comprehensive review investigates how tacticisation of strategy is conceptualised by analysing a range of different interpretations. The aim is to identify common properties relating to how tacticisation of strategy is conceived, how it manifests, and how it influences strategy. The review demonstrates the near-universal practice of leveraging Michael Handel’s work, and the absence of thorough examination by any scholar, has not prevented a proliferation of different explanations for the concept of tacticisation of strategy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Issues in Air and Space Power
Published
2026-02-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58930/bp53952301
Primary Topic
Military History and Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tacticisation of Strategy: A Comprehensive Review

David Hood
Contemporary Issues in Air and Space Power
Military History and Strategy
article

Tacticisation of Strategy: A Comprehensive Review

David Hood
article en

Abstract

Strategy has been expressed in many different ways, such as a course of action that integrates ends, ways and means to meet policy objectives. However, strategy can be replaced by tactics and some scholars have labelled this phenomenon ‘tacticisation of strategy’. In the context of this review, ‘strategy’ means a specific plan concerning the direction and use made of means, by chosen ways, to achieve desired ends. Its function is to cope with a particular historical context in time and space. On the other hand, ‘tactics’ refers to actual military behaviour or how strategy is executed. This comprehensive review investigates how tacticisation of strategy is conceptualised by analysing a range of different interpretations. The aim is to identify common properties relating to how tacticisation of strategy is conceived, how it manifests, and how it influences strategy. The review demonstrates the near-universal practice of leveraging Michael Handel’s work, and the absence of thorough examination by any scholar, has not prevented a proliferation of different explanations for the concept of tacticisation of strategy.

Contemporary Issues in Air and Space PowerVol. 4(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Military History and Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tacticisation of Strategy: A Comprehensive Review — David Hood · Contemporary Issues in Air and Space Power (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS