Navigating doubt: the impact of scientific uncertainty in health communication and the role of recipient literacy and uncertainty intolerance

Background Uncertainty is an important and frequently studied topic in health communication. It can be caused by many different sources. However, research in which the effects of different sources of uncertainty are compared is limited, and little is known about the impact of recipient characteristics on these effects.Aims We investigate whether different sources of message uncertainty impact perceived medication effectiveness and behavioral intentions. In addition, we explore the potential impact on message credibility, as well as the moderating role of recipients’ intolerance of uncertainty, science literacy, and health literacy.Methods In our preregistered, online between-subjects experiment, we manipulated the independent variable ‘uncertainty of the medicine’s effectiveness’. Participants (N = 946, Dutch) were asked to imagine that they suffered from a severe headache for which existing medication proved ineffective. Subsequently, they were randomly exposed to one of four experimental messages. In the certain outcome condition, the message communicated that a recently introduced medicine will be effective in reducing this type of headache. In the three uncertain outcome conditions, the message read that effectiveness was unsure for different reasons; i.e., limited scientific evidence, expert disagreement, or conditional effectiveness.Results The certain outcome message resulted in higher perceived effectiveness of the medicine and higher intentions to take the medicine compared to the conditions presenting an uncertain outcome. There were no differences in perceived effectiveness and intentions to take the medicine between the three uncertain conditions. Furthermore, the uncertainty sources did not impact perceived message credibility, nor did uncertainty intolerance, science literacy, or health literacy play a moderating role.Discussion Our study concludes that communicating uncertainty about a new treatment decreases the perceived effectiveness and acceptance of this treatment, but this effect does not depend on the source of the uncertainty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Literacy and Communication Open
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/28355245.2026.2614122
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating doubt: the impact of scientific uncertainty in health communication and the role of recipient literacy and uncertainty intolerance

Corine S. Meppelink, Aart van Stekelenburg, Lisa Vandeberg
Health Literacy and Communication Open
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Navigating doubt: the impact of scientific uncertainty in health communication and the role of recipient literacy and uncertainty intolerance

Corine S. Meppelink, Aart van Stekelenburg, Lisa Vandeberg
article en

Abstract

Background Uncertainty is an important and frequently studied topic in health communication. It can be caused by many different sources. However, research in which the effects of different sources of uncertainty are compared is limited, and little is known about the impact of recipient characteristics on these effects.Aims We investigate whether different sources of message uncertainty impact perceived medication effectiveness and behavioral intentions. In addition, we explore the potential impact on message credibility, as well as the moderating role of recipients’ intolerance of uncertainty, science literacy, and health literacy.Methods In our preregistered, online between-subjects experiment, we manipulated the independent variable ‘uncertainty of the medicine’s effectiveness’. Participants (N = 946, Dutch) were asked to imagine that they suffered from a severe headache for which existing medication proved ineffective. Subsequently, they were randomly exposed to one of four experimental messages. In the certain outcome condition, the message communicated that a recently introduced medicine will be effective in reducing this type of headache. In the three uncertain outcome conditions, the message read that effectiveness was unsure for different reasons; i.e., limited scientific evidence, expert disagreement, or conditional effectiveness.Results The certain outcome message resulted in higher perceived effectiveness of the medicine and higher intentions to take the medicine compared to the conditions presenting an uncertain outcome. There were no differences in perceived effectiveness and intentions to take the medicine between the three uncertain conditions. Furthermore, the uncertainty sources did not impact perceived message credibility, nor did uncertainty intolerance, science literacy, or health literacy play a moderating role.Discussion Our study concludes that communicating uncertainty about a new treatment decreases the perceived effectiveness and acceptance of this treatment, but this effect does not depend on the source of the uncertainty.

Health Literacy and Communication OpenVol. 4(1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University Medical Center (US), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Community Care (US), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.