Comparison of activation effort for hematology/oncology studies versus non-hematology/oncology studies using the investigational drug services complexity scoring tool

While the CST can estimate effort based on study complexity, it does not differentiate complexity by therapeutic area. Using real-world data based on IDS practice experience, this study confirmed that hematology/oncology studies require greater effort for certain study activation activities than non-hematology/oncology studies. There is an opportunity to continue refining the CST as a valuable tool for assessing study complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxag045
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of activation effort for hematology/oncology studies versus non-hematology/oncology studies using the investigational drug services complexity scoring tool

A.J. Conrad Smith, Yihan Sun, Michelle Nguyen, Dawud Ellayan
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Comparison of activation effort for hematology/oncology studies versus non-hematology/oncology studies using the investigational drug services complexity scoring tool

A.J. Conrad Smith, Yihan Sun, Michelle Nguyen, Dawud Ellayan
article en

Abstract

While the CST can estimate effort based on study complexity, it does not differentiate complexity by therapeutic area. Using real-world data based on IDS practice experience, this study confirmed that hematology/oncology studies require greater effort for certain study activation activities than non-hematology/oncology studies. There is an opportunity to continue refining the CST as a valuable tool for assessing study complexity.

American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
University of Michigan (US), Michigan Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.