The shadow of social desirability bias: evidence from reassessing the sources of political trust in China

Abstract Recent scholarship has emphasized methodological innovations to mitigate preference falsification in public opinion data, yet systematic scrutiny of bias in regression analyses remains limited. Drawing on analyses of political trust in China, we offer three key insights. First, determining the direction of social desirability bias in regression estimates—whether over- or underestimation—is challenging ex ante . Second, analyses of two nationally representative Chinese surveys, one incorporating a list experiment, cast doubt on the purported positive effect of social welfare expansion on political trust. Extending beyond social welfare and the Chinese case, we find similar biases when regressions rely on direct questions. Third, we show that certain identification strategies can partially mitigate regression bias when direct questions are unavoidable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Science Research and Methods
Published
2026-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2025.10080
Primary Topic
Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The shadow of social desirability bias: evidence from reassessing the sources of political trust in China

Xiaobo Lü, Shuang Ma, Ding Li, Wenhui Yang
Political Science Research and Methods
Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
article

The shadow of social desirability bias: evidence from reassessing the sources of political trust in China

Xiaobo Lü, Shuang Ma, Ding Li, Wenhui Yang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent scholarship has emphasized methodological innovations to mitigate preference falsification in public opinion data, yet systematic scrutiny of bias in regression analyses remains limited. Drawing on analyses of political trust in China, we offer three key insights. First, determining the direction of social desirability bias in regression estimates—whether over- or underestimation—is challenging ex ante . Second, analyses of two nationally representative Chinese surveys, one incorporating a list experiment, cast doubt on the purported positive effect of social welfare expansion on political trust. Extending beyond social welfare and the Chinese case, we find similar biases when regressions rely on direct questions. Third, we show that certain identification strategies can partially mitigate regression bias when direct questions are unavoidable.

Political Science Research and Methods
Peking University (CN), Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN), University of California System (US), Guangzhou University (CN)
American Political Science Association, University of Cambridge
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The shadow of social desirability bias: evidence from reassessing the sources of political trust in China — Xiaobo Lü, Shuang Ma, et al. · Political Science Research and Methods (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS