Reconciling Goffman and Disability Studies: “Interactional” and “Structural” Stigma in the Lives of Parents of Learning‐Disabled Adults

Erving Goffman cuts a divisive figure in disability studies. Some criticize his conception of “stigma” as deviance‐focused and as ignoring structural forces that shape personal encounters. Others praise his recognition of stigma as an interactional phenomenon. Drawing on research with parents of learning‐disabled adults, I conceptualize stigma in interactionist (Goffman‐inspired) and structural (disability‐studies‐inspired) terms. Parents reflect positively on their lives yet can confront stigma in “micro” public interactions. Stigma is also located in encounters with “macro” institutions. I conclude by highlighting how building upon Goffman's scholarship helps to thaw out a historically frosty treatment of his contribution in disability studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symbolic Interaction
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.70070
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconciling Goffman and Disability Studies: “Interactional” and “Structural” Stigma in the Lives of Parents of Learning‐Disabled Adults

Gareth Thomas
Symbolic Interaction
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Reconciling Goffman and Disability Studies: “Interactional” and “Structural” Stigma in the Lives of Parents of Learning‐Disabled Adults

Gareth Thomas
article en

Abstract

Erving Goffman cuts a divisive figure in disability studies. Some criticize his conception of “stigma” as deviance‐focused and as ignoring structural forces that shape personal encounters. Others praise his recognition of stigma as an interactional phenomenon. Drawing on research with parents of learning‐disabled adults, I conceptualize stigma in interactionist (Goffman‐inspired) and structural (disability‐studies‐inspired) terms. Parents reflect positively on their lives yet can confront stigma in “micro” public interactions. Stigma is also located in encounters with “macro” institutions. I conclude by highlighting how building upon Goffman's scholarship helps to thaw out a historically frosty treatment of his contribution in disability studies.

Symbolic Interaction
Cardiff University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.