Open science practices for better NDCs: Supporting transparent and accountable climate mitigation action

The Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) are key documents providing the starting point for increasingly ambitious ‘pledge-and-review’ cycles leading to the implementation of the Paris Agreement. However, current NDCs often lack consistent and transparent targets and indicators to ensure their in-country realisation and their monitoring, tracking, and reporting in compliance with the current climate change regime. This is particularly true for developing countries, where resources and capacity to define and implement climate action plans are still largely lacking among practitioners. To tackle this problem, this essay proposes a framework for NDCs development focusing on the practitioners’ – i.e., modellers and expert analysts – uptake of open science practices, particularly concerning open-source tools and open data, via capacity-building initiatives as a first step towards transparent and accountable NDCs delivery and implementation to the benefit of national and international climate governance. The framework is applied to the case study of Costa Rica, to test its relevance and applicability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Climate
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000839
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open science practices for better NDCs: Supporting transparent and accountable climate mitigation action

Maryna Henrysson, Agnese Beltramo, Will Usher
PLOS Climate
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Open science practices for better NDCs: Supporting transparent and accountable climate mitigation action

Maryna Henrysson, Agnese Beltramo, Will Usher
article en

Abstract

The Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) are key documents providing the starting point for increasingly ambitious ‘pledge-and-review’ cycles leading to the implementation of the Paris Agreement. However, current NDCs often lack consistent and transparent targets and indicators to ensure their in-country realisation and their monitoring, tracking, and reporting in compliance with the current climate change regime. This is particularly true for developing countries, where resources and capacity to define and implement climate action plans are still largely lacking among practitioners. To tackle this problem, this essay proposes a framework for NDCs development focusing on the practitioners’ – i.e., modellers and expert analysts – uptake of open science practices, particularly concerning open-source tools and open data, via capacity-building initiatives as a first step towards transparent and accountable NDCs delivery and implementation to the benefit of national and international climate governance. The framework is applied to the case study of Costa Rica, to test its relevance and applicability.

PLOS ClimateVol. 5(2)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Open science practices for better NDCs: Supporting transparent and accountable climate mitigation action — Maryna Henrysson, Agnese Beltramo, et al. · PLOS Climate (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS