Emerging Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Evaluation of Dental Composite Restorations: A Scoping Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in restorative dentistry, but its role in assessing dental composite restorations is not yet well established. This scoping review evaluated how AI has been used to assess mechanical, esthetic, and diagnostic aspects of composite restorations. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from 2020 to July 30, 2025, identified studies that applied AI to assess dental composite restorations. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and all but one had a low to moderate risk of bias. Reported AI applications included tooth shade matching, evaluating mechanical properties, classifying restoration types from images and radiographs, predicting clinical performance, assessing cure depth and microtensile bond strength to estimate debonding risk, and identifying factors associated with marginal microleakage. The highest reported predictive accuracies were achieved by an artificial neural network predicting abrasive wear (99.7% accuracy), adaptive boosting and multilayer Perceptron models predicting flexural strength and Vickers hardness (up to 99.0 and 98.9% accuracy, respectively), and extreme gradient boosting predicting mechanical properties (98.8-99.6% accuracy), each on task- and dataset-specific internal validation. Overall, current AI models show promise for supporting composite restoration evaluation but remain at an early, proof-of-concept stage. The use of small, often single-center samples and the absence of external validation suggest that their performance metrics may be overly optimistic and not yet ready for clinical application. Larger, multi-center datasets, transparent reporting, external validation, and formal assessments of clinical utility are needed before these tools can be considered for routine clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Dentistry
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1816536
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emerging Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Evaluation of Dental Composite Restorations: A Scoping Review

Negar Jamshidi, Selçuk Yılmaz, Hatice I. Yılmaz
European Journal of Dentistry
Dental materials and restorations
article

Emerging Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Evaluation of Dental Composite Restorations: A Scoping Review

Negar Jamshidi, Selçuk Yılmaz, Hatice I. Yılmaz
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in restorative dentistry, but its role in assessing dental composite restorations is not yet well established. This scoping review evaluated how AI has been used to assess mechanical, esthetic, and diagnostic aspects of composite restorations. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from 2020 to July 30, 2025, identified studies that applied AI to assess dental composite restorations. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and all but one had a low to moderate risk of bias. Reported AI applications included tooth shade matching, evaluating mechanical properties, classifying restoration types from images and radiographs, predicting clinical performance, assessing cure depth and microtensile bond strength to estimate debonding risk, and identifying factors associated with marginal microleakage. The highest reported predictive accuracies were achieved by an artificial neural network predicting abrasive wear (99.7% accuracy), adaptive boosting and multilayer Perceptron models predicting flexural strength and Vickers hardness (up to 99.0 and 98.9% accuracy, respectively), and extreme gradient boosting predicting mechanical properties (98.8-99.6% accuracy), each on task- and dataset-specific internal validation. Overall, current AI models show promise for supporting composite restoration evaluation but remain at an early, proof-of-concept stage. The use of small, often single-center samples and the absence of external validation suggest that their performance metrics may be overly optimistic and not yet ready for clinical application. Larger, multi-center datasets, transparent reporting, external validation, and formal assessments of clinical utility are needed before these tools can be considered for routine clinical application.

European Journal of Dentistry
Monash Medical Centre (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Oldham Council (GB), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.