C–C Bond Formation during Electrochemical CO <sub>2</sub> Reduction on Pristine Cu(100) Unlikely to Involve Adsorbed CO at Any Potential

Formation of hydrocarbons containing two or more carbon atoms (C<sub>2+</sub>) during heterogeneous electrochemical CO and CO<sub>2</sub> reduction (ECOR and ECO<sub>2</sub>R) only occurs, among pure metals, on Cu electrodes. Moreover, the activity and selectivity is facet dependent, with Cu(100) generally preferentially forming ethylene over methane. Previously, we found via quantum-mechanics-based modeling that, unlike standard density functional theory, more accurate correlated wavefunction methods predict that non-electroactive coupling pathways involving two adsorbed COs (*CO) or a *CO and a *COH to form C-C bonds on Cu(100) are kinetically inhibited, with the former also thermodynamically unfavorable. Here, we extend that embedded complete active space second order perturbation theory (ECASPT2) study, further showing that electrochemical coupling of two *COs to form an anionic dimer [OC*-*CO]<sup>(1+δ)-</sup>, followed by protonation to form [OC*-*COH]<sup>δ-</sup>, is not kinetically competitive with the reduction of *CO to *COH at relevant ECO/CO<sub>2</sub>R potentials. Our simulations therefore suggest that the ability of Cu(100) to electrochemically synthesize C<sub>2+</sub> molecules from CO and CO<sub>2</sub> is unlikely to be via *CO, at least on pristine Cu(100). Instead, hydrogenated CO species (*COH, *CH<sub><i>x</i></sub>OH, or *CH<sub><i>x</i></sub>) are most likely to be the key intermediates in C-C bond formation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c20300
Citations
1
Primary Topic
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

C–C Bond Formation during Electrochemical CO 2 Reduction on Pristine Cu(100) Unlikely to Involve Adsorbed CO at Any Potential

John Mark P. Martirez, Emily A. Carter
1 citations
Journal of the American Chemical Society
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
9.79
article

C–C Bond Formation during Electrochemical CO 2 Reduction on Pristine Cu(100) Unlikely to Involve Adsorbed CO at Any Potential

John Mark P. Martirez, Emily A. Carter
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Formation of hydrocarbons containing two or more carbon atoms (C<sub>2+</sub>) during heterogeneous electrochemical CO and CO<sub>2</sub> reduction (ECOR and ECO<sub>2</sub>R) only occurs, among pure metals, on Cu electrodes. Moreover, the activity and selectivity is facet dependent, with Cu(100) generally preferentially forming ethylene over methane. Previously, we found via quantum-mechanics-based modeling that, unlike standard density functional theory, more accurate correlated wavefunction methods predict that non-electroactive coupling pathways involving two adsorbed COs (*CO) or a *CO and a *COH to form C-C bonds on Cu(100) are kinetically inhibited, with the former also thermodynamically unfavorable. Here, we extend that embedded complete active space second order perturbation theory (ECASPT2) study, further showing that electrochemical coupling of two *COs to form an anionic dimer [OC*-*CO]<sup>(1+δ)-</sup>, followed by protonation to form [OC*-*COH]<sup>δ-</sup>, is not kinetically competitive with the reduction of *CO to *COH at relevant ECO/CO<sub>2</sub>R potentials. Our simulations therefore suggest that the ability of Cu(100) to electrochemically synthesize C<sub>2+</sub> molecules from CO and CO<sub>2</sub> is unlikely to be via *CO, at least on pristine Cu(100). Instead, hydrogenated CO species (*COH, *CH<sub><i>x</i></sub>OH, or *CH<sub><i>x</i></sub>) are most likely to be the key intermediates in C-C bond formation.

Journal of the American Chemical SocietyVol. 148(7)
Princeton University (US), Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
9.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.